Killing thirteen and attempting to kill seven more is hardly the work of a member of the civilised society you constantly talk about.
It’s a jungle out there and if we crave utopia we have to eliminate the square pegs who don’t fit in order for civilised society to go about their business without fear of Sutcliffes and his ilk.
But...you cant really have degrees of 'badness' to determine execution.All murder(s) are bad.Its either or for capital punishment.It shudnt be down to the Home Sec to effectively sign off a death warrant (if CP returned)
Retro. If the cops involved hadn't been so thick some lives would have been spared. I remember that member of the public took a blood stained hand bag into a police station & it was put away as lost-property.
We have to take them out of society and ensure the time fits the crime.People often make distinctions say,that if someone murders a policeman or a frontline worker say,then somehow the crime deserves a stiffer punishment than joe bloggs? I dont get that logic.Murder is murder full stop.
All Sutcliffes victims were innocent.Sex workers or not.Like I said before many attitudes in the police towards the latter havent changed today and that is so wrong
Khandro,not to mention the famous £5 note clue found on one body that was newly printed and only distributed to a handful of businesses inc Sutcliffes employers...
Khandro//Retro. If the cops involved hadn't been so thick some lives would have been spared//
You have no idea what was happening in the investigation and might I suggest that you keep your disaparaging remarks to yourself.
There are major problems with having the death penalty, the biggest being that juries are far less likely to find the accused guilty of murder.
In the Sutcliffe case it is probable that an insanity defence would have been successful preventing the death penalty.