Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Tory Censorship
Tory censorship now strikes at its own Party's Ministers. What a useless bunch they're turning out to be.
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"You seem keen on pushing no-hopers as being better for some reason. The country needed a patriot at the helm. "
Johnson cares about nobody but himself Old_Geezer. He's not a patriot. Rory Stewart spent years in diplomatic and political service quietly and competently representing his country's interests. Johnson had a spell as foreign sec... the less said of it the better, balls up after balls up. I say stewart is better because he is better and would have been a far better choice to lead this country in a crisis. So would Jeremy Hunt, who was not a "no-hoper" - he came second. But the tories didnt want competence, they wanted someone worse and however they choose to rationalise it after the fact is up to them but it is the rest of us who have to endure it.
Johnson cares about nobody but himself Old_Geezer. He's not a patriot. Rory Stewart spent years in diplomatic and political service quietly and competently representing his country's interests. Johnson had a spell as foreign sec... the less said of it the better, balls up after balls up. I say stewart is better because he is better and would have been a far better choice to lead this country in a crisis. So would Jeremy Hunt, who was not a "no-hoper" - he came second. But the tories didnt want competence, they wanted someone worse and however they choose to rationalise it after the fact is up to them but it is the rest of us who have to endure it.
"
Entitled wanted a completely non-tory Tory Party leader."
It would be a start spicerack! Either that or the party grows up and starts choosing better people to lead the rest of us. It would be nice ideally if labour did the same but they have not been anywhere near power for a decade and probably won't have a sniff until 2030...
Entitled wanted a completely non-tory Tory Party leader."
It would be a start spicerack! Either that or the party grows up and starts choosing better people to lead the rest of us. It would be nice ideally if labour did the same but they have not been anywhere near power for a decade and probably won't have a sniff until 2030...
Of course it's their fault, encouraged by dissidents in the UK creating obstacles. The oven ready option is still there.
Anyone considering not freeing this nation is no supporter of it nor of democracy. The Tories wanted someone able to gather support of the electorate and push through the exit from the EU. Other suppositions regarding who they chose is irrelevant as it looks as if we got what we needed at present.
Anyone considering not freeing this nation is no supporter of it nor of democracy. The Tories wanted someone able to gather support of the electorate and push through the exit from the EU. Other suppositions regarding who they chose is irrelevant as it looks as if we got what we needed at present.
their choice, untitled, for the time being its that or have a vote of no confidence, and can't see that happening, we are in uncharted waters with Brexit looming and a rampant virus, you don;t care for him, your choice nor do many on here it would seem But ab is one small forum and has no voice. If people want to select a different party they are going to have to wait a while.
