Stripped Of Their Title?

[smurfchops]

Harry and Meghan. Yes or no?

[Theland]

The mistake many people make is to think our liberal democracy is the default position.
It is not.
Most countries are a shambles, so what we have needs to be valued and protected.
Therefore, the attacks on the Crown by Meghan are an attack on us all.
We have a right to demand !loyalty from Harry and Meghan.
Stripped of their titles they can indulge their wokeness abroad.

[choux]

The interview was meant to be destructive and divisive. Megan was out to self promote, to increase her earning power and popularity.

I know some here won't give much credence to my following link but I found it to be very insightful and nothing in it contradicts any of my views on this matter. It is a lengthy piece but I viewed it in its entirety.


I would add that elsewhere, Lady C says she understands (and I believe she has some very good contacts) pre-broadcast that the accusations contributed to Prince Philip's condition.

I still cannot see any reason why they should retain or deserve the titles.

[naomi24]

Mozz... dear ...they lied.

[Mozz71]

//Therefore, the attacks on the Crown by Meghan are an attack on us all.//

Well, I don't feel attacked by their interview. Bored, but not attacked.

[NickorWan]

I think they should lose the duke and duchess titles as they have chosen not to serve the country.

Most of the criticism seems to be directed towards Mehgan Markle, but if my brother did the dirty on our family, it would be him I would blame regardless of whether or not his wife put him up to it. Also, if one of my family said something that I knew would deeply upset my OH, I wouldn’t be telling her, I would deal with it. I think Harry has always wanted this moment to hurt the Firm, perhaps understandably.

[Mozz71]

Dearest Naomi, I must've missed the part went they stated they were playing opposites. Do you think that them calling HRH to check in on Phil was a lie too? Or the part when MM said that the Queen had always been welcoming to her on a personal level?

[Ken4155]

McMouse, unlike the Official Secrets Act, the Oath Of Allegiance is not a lifelong contract. You pledge your oath only until the day you cease to be a member of the Armed Forces/Reserves. My contract with HM, her heirs and successors ended in 1985.

[naomi24]

Mozz, how can you be sure that anything a proven liar says is true?

[vulcan42]

If Meghan is annoyed at what Piers Morgan has said, she'll be apoplectic at the Australian Alan Jones. Two links here posted by webbo3.
https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1743592.html

[Mozz71]

Everyone lies sometimes, it doesn't mean that everything they say is a lie.

[Fairlight]

I agree with everything you say NickorWan

[naomi24]

I see, Mozz. In your world lies are fine if the ‘woke’ are telling them. Apart from the nonsense she’s spouted about knowing nothing of the life that lay ahead of her before she married Harry - despite both of them saying previously she’d been warned - and her having spent Christmas at Sandringham with the Royal family prior to the wedding - I’d love to know how she flew to different places around the world with no passport - that, she says, taken away from her by the palace. Additionally, why was she given no help with her claimed mental health problems? At the very least she had a husband and a mother supporting her. I don't believe a word she said. She’s presenting herself as Diana Mark II, an abandoned and emotionally-battered victim - but she’s not. Far from it. She’s a self-serving schemer intent on inflicting damage and hurt - and he's either blind or stupid for failing to recognise that. He didn't even seem to notice when his account of an incident differed from hers. Shameful. I really hope all this comes back to bite them. They deserve nothing less.

[Bobbisox1]

// stripped of their Title//
Q) Will it cost me as a tax payer if they're not?
If the answer is No then I could give a flying whattsit!
I just want them to disappear in plastic la la land

[tamborine]

Offence at skin color? This is the popular reply

[burlyshirley]

I wonder if Meghan complained about that Australian journalist who had a pop at them - bet she didn't !

[tamborine]

Yes, remove titles to assist them pursue a life of anonimity they desire.

[Mozz71]

Naomi //I see, Mozz. In your world lies are fine if the ‘woke’ are telling them.//

Well, that's a so rule violation without using the offending word. I said absolutely nothing of the sort. I said that everybody lies sometimes. That's a universal truth. I don't know if what Mrs Markle said is truth or utter fiction, and nor do you, because you weren't privvy to the events in question. While I'll concede that some of what she said sounds highly suspect, I don't know for sure. I just choose not to immediately assume everything someone says is a complete fabrication because of that suspicion. I'm sure the palace will get to the bottom of the allegations one way or another.

[choux]

This is a dreadful matter for the Queen to deal with. In normal conditions it should be remembered that it is Prince Philip who is head of the Royal Family. The Queen has always left to him this role. He remains in hospital and it is the Queen who now has the task of marshalling everyone to sort this out. Who would want that at the age of 94 years?

[New Judge]

//...it should be remembered that it is Prince Philip who is head of the Royal Family.//

No he isn't. He married into it. The Queen is Head of State and so is head of the Royal Family. Your notion indicates that it must be a man who is the head of a family, despite - most definitely in this case - evidence to the contrary.

[naomi24]

Well, we know that some of it was utter fiction, Mozz, as I’ve indicated. I thought she was smarter than that but clearly she isn’t.