Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 180rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Shocking !
Sick on every level.
The swear filter would star out what I think of this deplorable pr1ck and he's sleazy mag!!!
An appalling, sick-minded, ill-considered cartoon.
Some people like to shock for the sake of it - this cartoon is the visual equivalent of a Frankie Boyle joke.
Bobbie Charlie Hebdo is a magazine. But I agree sick and despicable!
disgusting!
perverted filth!
and when did you think that the average 8 y o ( Aber that is!) could understand French

More French practice for CSE students here

https://www.marseillenews.net/degout-alors-que-charlie-hebdo-depeint-la-reine-agenouillee-sur-le-cou-de-meghan-markle-comme-george-floyd-royal-nouvelles/

remember that pouvoir - - -poo-vwar means to be able
Don't insult fellow AB members Peter, it's rude and tedious.
I'm unable to get my dander up.
Weird because most people laughed when they did the cartoon of the Prophet Mohamed, which sparked the killings at Charlie Hebbo , but people are 'outraged' at a similar tongue in cheek cartoon depicting the Royal Family. Double standards?
in all honesty i cant get upset about it. I don't know any of the people involved, so cant really get upset on their behalf
Precisely, APG. I for one think it's very funny.
yes ma'am sorry ma'am I will only say what you approve

which is the point of this thread innit - people disapproving of what other people say. Art imitating Life

Oh- can i say or will I get censored? stop being a skool marm ma'am, you are overegging the pudding
It's a cartoon, for heaven's sake! How can anyone actually be bothered to be bother by this?
I think the anger is because it depicts how a man died, not because it involves the Queen.
I am neither outraged or upset - I just think it's sick.

I didn't laugh at the cartoon of Mohammed either.
vulcan - // I think the anger is because it depicts how a man died, not because it involves the Queen. //

I would agree - the Royal Family are obvious and some would say compulsory targets for satire - but the manner of an innocent man's violent death is not.
I must admit unless this had been brought up on AB, I wouldn't be aware of interested in what Charlie Hebo does or doesn't do. I don't find the cartoon funny nor did I find the Mohammed cartoon funny. But at least the royalists won't commit an act of terrorism regarding it.
et je ne suis pas Charlie. Diabolique.
Both this and the Mohamed depiction are quite insensitive however I don't think this one will result in multiple murders by terrorists.

1 to 20 of 180rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Je Ne Suis Pas Charlie

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.