Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
So The Capitol Riots Officer Died From Natural Causes...
much to the embarrassment of AB's 'know it all' gang.
I know they'll never apologise or admit to being wrong but will they ever learn ?
I know they'll never apologise or admit to being wrong but will they ever learn ?
Answers
//Who is the AB know it all gang?// Look above. This story highlights the problem of trial by media without all the facts, something regularly done on AB by some. And no, you wont see any apologies just daft OTT comments as seen above.
08:06 Sun 25th Apr 2021
Didn't the left wing attack dogs use the fact that Trump organised an attack with a fire extinguisher on a policeman, who the left have all mysteriously taken to loathing since, as part of the pressure sale to impeach him? Nobody there now to hear the truth ... they are all eagerly driving on to the next "story" to ramp up or manipulate to hide the insidious agenda. Meanwhile questioning or refuting the media lies gives them the stimulus to brand you a dangerous right wing wannabe fascist.
Fox News taking the moral high ground is hilarious.
Whether the officer's death was directly linked to the riots or not, this doesn't exonerate Trump from being the catalyst that caused the riots. Should CNN be covering the story? Yes, they absolutely should be, and should be ashamed for covering it up. Their fake earnestness is as bad as Fox's pomposity. Neither should be considered creditable news sources.
Whether the officer's death was directly linked to the riots or not, this doesn't exonerate Trump from being the catalyst that caused the riots. Should CNN be covering the story? Yes, they absolutely should be, and should be ashamed for covering it up. Their fake earnestness is as bad as Fox's pomposity. Neither should be considered creditable news sources.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
so he would have died at that time wherever he was - as his time was up? Very Islamic, I admit
I dont believe it either, however I do accept it will be a reason to acquit on charges of causing his death
The Americans still have a legal doctrine of constructive manslaughter ( and murder) - the people were in the capitol with criminal intent and this intent can be transferred to criminal act which lack the necessary intent
[Constructive manslaughter is also referred to as "unlawful act" manslaughter. It is based on the doctrine of constructive malice, whereby the malicious intent inherent in the commission of a crime is considered to apply to the consequences of that crime.]
the english judges have been trying to get away from this
yeah I kinda understand why people dont read my posts
I dont believe it either, however I do accept it will be a reason to acquit on charges of causing his death
The Americans still have a legal doctrine of constructive manslaughter ( and murder) - the people were in the capitol with criminal intent and this intent can be transferred to criminal act which lack the necessary intent
[Constructive manslaughter is also referred to as "unlawful act" manslaughter. It is based on the doctrine of constructive malice, whereby the malicious intent inherent in the commission of a crime is considered to apply to the consequences of that crime.]
the english judges have been trying to get away from this
yeah I kinda understand why people dont read my posts
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.