Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Boris' Flat In No. 10
Isn't Boris right when he says the general public don't give a toss about how it's re-furbished?
Isn't this the MSM (& Starmer) trying to make something out of nothing?
https:/
Isn't this the MSM (& Starmer) trying to make something out of nothing?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
no
old etonians with their hands in the till
disgusting
william funkmeyer was given the embassy ( ship ) of London on condition he rebuilt it - which he set to - wivviz wife and sorrta rebuilt the whole lot -1975
and then piled the whole fambly into a carriage to visit the queen. Ambassadors dont apparently
old etonians with their hands in the till
disgusting
william funkmeyer was given the embassy ( ship ) of London on condition he rebuilt it - which he set to - wivviz wife and sorrta rebuilt the whole lot -1975
and then piled the whole fambly into a carriage to visit the queen. Ambassadors dont apparently
Ref. Theresa May et al & no. 10;
https:/
https:/
done before
naughty Lord Cupid - - Tony Blair's Lord Chancellor, had his office expensively redecorated, and there was a lot of ya-ya at the time
Lord Irvine
in 1998, the Lord Chancellor's official residence in the Palace of Westminster was redecorated at a cost to the taxpayer of £650,000. Hand-printed wallpaper alone accounted for £59,000.[7] Much of the criticism devolved on Irvine, despite responsibility for the renovations lying with the House of Lords authorities rather than Irvine himself. Contractors working on the renovations were forced to sign the Official Secrets Act to avoid revelations
oo-er that the labour way to do it
and perhaps accounts for why we dont usually hear of it
naughty Lord Cupid - - Tony Blair's Lord Chancellor, had his office expensively redecorated, and there was a lot of ya-ya at the time
Lord Irvine
in 1998, the Lord Chancellor's official residence in the Palace of Westminster was redecorated at a cost to the taxpayer of £650,000. Hand-printed wallpaper alone accounted for £59,000.[7] Much of the criticism devolved on Irvine, despite responsibility for the renovations lying with the House of Lords authorities rather than Irvine himself. Contractors working on the renovations were forced to sign the Official Secrets Act to avoid revelations
oo-er that the labour way to do it
and perhaps accounts for why we dont usually hear of it
YMB is right. I'm quite happy for the taxpayer to pay for it (within reason). I'm not happy for it to be done by private donors to the PM and his party; it puts them in a position to call in favours - and far too many of them have been getting favours, in the way of non-competitive tenders for contracts and big jobs they can't handle (eg Dido Harding).
jno; The flat is the property of the nation, not whoever happens to be living there, but it's also a place where some of the world's top VIPs can be informally entertained (Maggie cooked meals for them even) & it represents Britain, it barely needs mentioning that it has to look very good don't you think?
