Quizzes & Puzzles30 mins ago
How Does This Work Then?
14 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/w orld-eu rope-57 257982
Shell are a multinational conglomerate operating world wide, how can they be bossed about by a single nation?
Shell are a multinational conglomerate operating world wide, how can they be bossed about by a single nation?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The answer is in your own link. This decision is an enforcement of the legally binding Paris Agreement:
'Under the terms of the Paris Agreement on climate change, nearly 200 nations agreed to keep global temperatures "well below" 2C above pre-industrial levels.
The legally binding treaty came into force on 4 November 2016. The US withdrew under former President Donald Trump but has since rejoined under President Joe Biden."
'Under the terms of the Paris Agreement on climate change, nearly 200 nations agreed to keep global temperatures "well below" 2C above pre-industrial levels.
The legally binding treaty came into force on 4 November 2016. The US withdrew under former President Donald Trump but has since rejoined under President Joe Biden."
//Under the terms of the Paris Agreement on climate change, nearly 200 nations agreed to keep global temperatures "//
Then the countries concerned need to make it illegal for individuals or corporations to carry out activities which will jeopardise the aims of those treaties. From the BBC report:
"The Shell verdict is a massive win for environmental campaigners, and other industrial giants will be scrambling to figure out how it could affect them."
"Because suddenly it's not good enough for firms to comply with the law on their emissions - in an extraordinary case like this, they have to comply with global climate policy too."
So a company now fully complying with national legislation lays itself open to "global climate policy" (whatever that might be).
As I said, the lunatics are slowly but very surely being allowed to take charge. I hope Shell successfully appeals this ridiculous ruling.
Then the countries concerned need to make it illegal for individuals or corporations to carry out activities which will jeopardise the aims of those treaties. From the BBC report:
"The Shell verdict is a massive win for environmental campaigners, and other industrial giants will be scrambling to figure out how it could affect them."
"Because suddenly it's not good enough for firms to comply with the law on their emissions - in an extraordinary case like this, they have to comply with global climate policy too."
So a company now fully complying with national legislation lays itself open to "global climate policy" (whatever that might be).
As I said, the lunatics are slowly but very surely being allowed to take charge. I hope Shell successfully appeals this ridiculous ruling.
They are under the legislation of the country they operate out of, in this case the Netherlands.
If you are a Dutch company, you have to obey Dutch law.
They may be a multinational company who operate in several countries, and have to obey local laws in those countries, but ultimately how the company is governed and under which legal framework they are judged is Holland, where they pay their tax.
Shell are a reputable company and choose to be Dutch. It gives them a lot of advantages, and a few disadvantages.
If you are a Dutch company, you have to obey Dutch law.
They may be a multinational company who operate in several countries, and have to obey local laws in those countries, but ultimately how the company is governed and under which legal framework they are judged is Holland, where they pay their tax.
Shell are a reputable company and choose to be Dutch. It gives them a lot of advantages, and a few disadvantages.
I wonder what Dutch law they've broken.
If a government wants its citizens and businesses to comply with a treaty they've signed they will need to introduce legislation which compels them to do so. Individuals and companies do not have to interpret and comply with international treaties. This ruling is a farce.
If a government wants its citizens and businesses to comply with a treaty they've signed they will need to introduce legislation which compels them to do so. Individuals and companies do not have to interpret and comply with international treaties. This ruling is a farce.
//This judgement only applies to the Netherlands so what's the big deal.//
Because give these nutters an inch and they take a mile.
It will be appealed I am sure. As NJ says if the Dutch want their companies to comply with the Paris accord they must legislate accordingly.
Alternatively of course Shell could just say sod you and pull out of Holland.
Because give these nutters an inch and they take a mile.
It will be appealed I am sure. As NJ says if the Dutch want their companies to comply with the Paris accord they must legislate accordingly.
Alternatively of course Shell could just say sod you and pull out of Holland.