Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
An Englishman Speaks Up For Freedom Of Speech In America
Answers
Good God AH, did a large bill just land on your doorstep? You sure do seem very grumpy. Thanks for sharing Khando its very interesting, more people need to stand up to those that wish to cancel others. Eh AH?
11:29 Tue 13th Jul 2021
// AH, why do you need to be aware of the OP’s opinion before posting your own? Would his opinion influence yours? Your argument makes no sense.//
er yeah - that is why it is called a discussion.
otherwise the more gormless Abers cd answer - yes I agree - or 'no'. oops there are a lot of them already.
as for freedom of speech - who thinks america has freedom of speech - they have libel laws for chrissakes - are we back to THAT again. - and as for the freedom to praise racist comments as has happened on Answerbank recently- no I dont we should have this freedom.
and yes this comment is dependent on what has gone before
( note if it is clear to an eight year old then you are aiming to high)
excuse Naomi - arent you an arch deleter on answerbank, of opinions you may not agree with on the day?
er yeah - that is why it is called a discussion.
otherwise the more gormless Abers cd answer - yes I agree - or 'no'. oops there are a lot of them already.
as for freedom of speech - who thinks america has freedom of speech - they have libel laws for chrissakes - are we back to THAT again. - and as for the freedom to praise racist comments as has happened on Answerbank recently- no I dont we should have this freedom.
and yes this comment is dependent on what has gone before
( note if it is clear to an eight year old then you are aiming to high)
excuse Naomi - arent you an arch deleter on answerbank, of opinions you may not agree with on the day?
// excuse Naomi - arent you an arch deleter on answerbank, of opinions you may not agree with on the day? //
To be a 'deleter', 'arch' or otherwise, naomi would need to be a moderator, and to the best of my knowledge she is not.
That said, Moderators are not permitted to delete posts simply because they personally do not agree with them, so even if Naomi were a Moderator, I am sure she would not abuse the privilege.
To be a 'deleter', 'arch' or otherwise, naomi would need to be a moderator, and to the best of my knowledge she is not.
That said, Moderators are not permitted to delete posts simply because they personally do not agree with them, so even if Naomi were a Moderator, I am sure she would not abuse the privilege.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.