Crosswords1 min ago
How Can You Have A Pregnant Man?
157 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.We aren't. I only know i identify as a woman, because I am one. Same for everyone else. Any difference can only be stereotyping.
You've avoided my other questions, and I'm only referring to transgender people (over 95%, as you know), not transsexuals or people with body dysmorphia...
But if over 80% of pre-op transsexuals are changing their minds with 2 years of anti- depressants, why is that not a requirement? And what does "living as a woman" actually mean?
You've avoided my other questions, and I'm only referring to transgender people (over 95%, as you know), not transsexuals or people with body dysmorphia...
But if over 80% of pre-op transsexuals are changing their minds with 2 years of anti- depressants, why is that not a requirement? And what does "living as a woman" actually mean?
// ...what reason is there, why men can't feel, identify, wear, behave, however they like- without having to pretend they are women? //
In one sense, at least, there shouldn't be a problem at all, but it's problematic to put things this way for two reasons. Firstly, you can hardly not notice the ridicule that "non-passing" trans people, particularly trans women, are subject to. That requires a change in behaviour on the part of the bullies, of course, but in the meantime it's not unreasonable to expect some people in that position to desire to attract as little attention as possible -- to, if you insist, "pretend" as convincingly as possible.
The second problem is that this seems to ignore the condition of gender dysphoria, which has nothing to do with how others perceive you but is all about how you perceive yourself. Historically, attempts to treat gender dysphoria by telling people that it's all in their head and to get over it (ie, to accept their body as it is and to match their gender to it) have been less than successful.
In one sense, at least, there shouldn't be a problem at all, but it's problematic to put things this way for two reasons. Firstly, you can hardly not notice the ridicule that "non-passing" trans people, particularly trans women, are subject to. That requires a change in behaviour on the part of the bullies, of course, but in the meantime it's not unreasonable to expect some people in that position to desire to attract as little attention as possible -- to, if you insist, "pretend" as convincingly as possible.
The second problem is that this seems to ignore the condition of gender dysphoria, which has nothing to do with how others perceive you but is all about how you perceive yourself. Historically, attempts to treat gender dysphoria by telling people that it's all in their head and to get over it (ie, to accept their body as it is and to match their gender to it) have been less than successful.
Jim, I addressed dysphoria as separate- and actually, we haven't tried to treat it as the psychological problem it is. If that were the case, we wouldn't have over 80% changing their minds with appropriate treatment.
And your first paragraph, Jim "is" unreasonable and unfair. Men don't trust other men, when they are presented differently. But expect women to. That's maybe the main issue that needs to be sorted.
Thanks boaty- you were lovely :-) x
And your first paragraph, Jim "is" unreasonable and unfair. Men don't trust other men, when they are presented differently. But expect women to. That's maybe the main issue that needs to be sorted.
Thanks boaty- you were lovely :-) x
// If you want to define women by biology *only* then feel free. //
when an individual is born, they are defined by visible biology - how can it be otherwise? a child that age cannot tell the registrar how they identify, what can be physically seen goes on the legal document.
maybe assigning of infants at birth should cease, and instead allow the legal document to be issued only when the individual can decide for themselves?
when an individual is born, they are defined by visible biology - how can it be otherwise? a child that age cannot tell the registrar how they identify, what can be physically seen goes on the legal document.
maybe assigning of infants at birth should cease, and instead allow the legal document to be issued only when the individual can decide for themselves?
Incidentally, your source for the 80% figure? As best as I can tell it's based on the narrow question of children questioning their identity, which isn't really the same as transgender people. I wonder if to an extent this is begging the question, ie if I'm defining trans people as specifically those who don't detransition, but whatever. It's misleading, all the same, to present children exploring their identity as equivalent to "pre-op transsexuals".