ChatterBank0 min ago
Rebranding Prince Andrew
If you were given the task of rebranding/rehabilitating Prince Andrew, how would you go about it?
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ comment isfree/ 2021/au g/28/re brandin g-princ e-andre w-now-t heres-a -real-m ission- impossi ble
Unless someone can think of some way to blame Harry and Meghan, I think this may be a non-starter.
https:/
Unless someone can think of some way to blame Harry and Meghan, I think this may be a non-starter.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.the thing I've never been able to find out for sure is whether Giuffre was legally a minor when it happened. The link says she was 17, which wouldn't have been illegal here, so I'm not inclined to be too outraged about it, though the question of trafficking is another matter.
A shame he had to give up the nebulous "business ambassador" role, because I've been told by someone who saw him in action that he was very good at it. He had his parents' knack for remembering names, faces, jobs and other details and was skilled at putting people in touch with others who could be helpful.
A shame he had to give up the nebulous "business ambassador" role, because I've been told by someone who saw him in action that he was very good at it. He had his parents' knack for remembering names, faces, jobs and other details and was skilled at putting people in touch with others who could be helpful.
Distinctly tricky. Start being really useful as an odd-job man on a council estate? (Are there any near Windsor?) He has rather a long ladder to climb. He could help in a food distribution centre - in fact spend a few years working for and with charities 'on the ground' - as long as the charities had nothing to do with children. 'Meals on wheels?'
bcc
Surely not everything can be determined by jurisprudence.
Brand Andrew is tainted not only by the Virginia Giuffre story but also by his BBC interview, his shady dealings with Middle Eastern businessmen, his over-use of private jets in the 90s, and his friendship with a convicted paedophile.
People aren't being nasty - they're acknowledging what we already know about the man. What is already in the public domain.
Surely not everything can be determined by jurisprudence.
Brand Andrew is tainted not only by the Virginia Giuffre story but also by his BBC interview, his shady dealings with Middle Eastern businessmen, his over-use of private jets in the 90s, and his friendship with a convicted paedophile.
People aren't being nasty - they're acknowledging what we already know about the man. What is already in the public domain.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.