Home & Garden2 mins ago
Will Rodders Make It To The Next Election In 2024?
29 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-585 91455
.....looks like he's not impressed the "enforcer"!
.....looks like he's not impressed the "enforcer"!
Answers
Didn't Labour's membership balloon when they were trying to get Corbyn elected? Perhaps they are all deciding it was a failed enterprise.
17:44 Fri 17th Sep 2021
// My understanding is we have lost at least 100,000 members so far. //
Voters lost patience with Labour and the party suffered a huge defeat at the last election. Now it appears that the members have realised they are wasting their time and leaving in droves. Starmer has no future, but I am not sure the party does either. New Labour was a bit of a sham and they should not do that again. But it feels like the organisation needs dismantling and rebuilding from the ground up. There is a lot of baggage to discard.
Voters lost patience with Labour and the party suffered a huge defeat at the last election. Now it appears that the members have realised they are wasting their time and leaving in droves. Starmer has no future, but I am not sure the party does either. New Labour was a bit of a sham and they should not do that again. But it feels like the organisation needs dismantling and rebuilding from the ground up. There is a lot of baggage to discard.
New Labour was an electable project.
The point of a serious political party is to be in power to change things or it is a complete waste of time. Say what you like about Blair, his governments got things done.
What caused a problem for the future by Blair’s own admission was taking too much power from the members, understandable tho that was. Hence the pro-Corbyn backlash.
Whether Labour’s leader is Starmer or anyone else, without power it is pointless.
Labour’s chief problem is probably the way it is itself governed: the NEC needs to be reformed.
The other issue it has as I’ve said before is that currently the Tories under Johnson have stolen a few of its clothes, at least in the talking stakes. Unless and until that’s exposed as a sham then it will be difficult for Labour.
The point of a serious political party is to be in power to change things or it is a complete waste of time. Say what you like about Blair, his governments got things done.
What caused a problem for the future by Blair’s own admission was taking too much power from the members, understandable tho that was. Hence the pro-Corbyn backlash.
Whether Labour’s leader is Starmer or anyone else, without power it is pointless.
Labour’s chief problem is probably the way it is itself governed: the NEC needs to be reformed.
The other issue it has as I’ve said before is that currently the Tories under Johnson have stolen a few of its clothes, at least in the talking stakes. Unless and until that’s exposed as a sham then it will be difficult for Labour.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.