ChatterBank2 mins ago
Trial Of 96 Year Old Former Nazi Secretary
A former secretary at a Nazi concentration camp has been captured after trying to flee before her trial in northern Germany. Irmgard Furchner, 96, charged with complicity in 11,000 murders, fled her care home and failed to turn up at court. She has since been discovered and arrested and is awaiting trial.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/w orld-eu rope-58 747082
The question is should she stand trial after all these years and at her advanced age - or is it too late?
https:/
The question is should she stand trial after all these years and at her advanced age - or is it too late?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// Some murderers would heave a sigh of relief to know that the passage of time offers a winning post,//
yeah see above because oral memory differs often from written record. Obvious door for defence - recollect that because there are dead bodies around you doesnt meant you committed murder
Perjury - deffo - perjury cases have been chucked out because it was so long ago ( Bartels )
yeah see above because oral memory differs often from written record. Obvious door for defence - recollect that because there are dead bodies around you doesnt meant you committed murder
Perjury - deffo - perjury cases have been chucked out because it was so long ago ( Bartels )
War Crime - on which she has been indicted ( I think)
has a varied history ( here )
Deffo an crime at international law ( Nuremburg etc) but THEN the wigs and scribblers in London found it was not a crime at English common law
whooooooops ( long whoops wivva jiggle in it)
So a bill was brought in - 1993 and it was necessary to back date it. Make what was NOT a crime in 1940, now a crime
going backwards yeah ( I must remember this is AB)
Lawful in english common law - not lawful at euro-law (*)
A lot of squawking about it by the Law Lords
and there has been so far one case in the UK
cost £50m I think, and he was acquitted.....
(*) making a law go backwards
has a varied history ( here )
Deffo an crime at international law ( Nuremburg etc) but THEN the wigs and scribblers in London found it was not a crime at English common law
whooooooops ( long whoops wivva jiggle in it)
So a bill was brought in - 1993 and it was necessary to back date it. Make what was NOT a crime in 1940, now a crime
going backwards yeah ( I must remember this is AB)
Lawful in english common law - not lawful at euro-law (*)
A lot of squawking about it by the Law Lords
and there has been so far one case in the UK
cost £50m I think, and he was acquitted.....
(*) making a law go backwards
//I think leave the old lady alone to finish her life.//
It's a difficult one because if she was complicit, there's the argument that very many of those tortured and murdered had no opportunity to grow old. Babies went to the gas chambers. And if she is found guilty, what are they going to do with her? Jail her? At her age I doubt it - and to what purpose anyway? Perhaps it will be enough that her past catches up with her.
It's a difficult one because if she was complicit, there's the argument that very many of those tortured and murdered had no opportunity to grow old. Babies went to the gas chambers. And if she is found guilty, what are they going to do with her? Jail her? At her age I doubt it - and to what purpose anyway? Perhaps it will be enough that her past catches up with her.
// Some murderers would heave a sigh of relief to know that the passage of time offers a winning post, //
yes ..... yes andie!
I quite agree
and only yesterday, a Tommy was indicted for murder of an irishman whilst he was in the Army, during the troubles in the seventies
yes yes agreed - no guilty man can lie in his bed and die - - the ex Tommy is terminal - without the threat of lawful retribution still hanging over his guilty paliasse....
( whistles and awaits the squawks of the aryan usual suspects.....)
yes ..... yes andie!
I quite agree
and only yesterday, a Tommy was indicted for murder of an irishman whilst he was in the Army, during the troubles in the seventies
yes yes agreed - no guilty man can lie in his bed and die - - the ex Tommy is terminal - without the threat of lawful retribution still hanging over his guilty paliasse....
( whistles and awaits the squawks of the aryan usual suspects.....)
It appears she gave evidence in the trial of Hoppe 70 years ago & nothing was alleged of her involvement then;
§§§ SS officer Paul Werner Hoppe, was convicted of his role in the camp and sentenced to nine years in prison by a West German court in 1957. He died in 1974.
As evidence during that investigation, given nearly 70 years ago, Furcher acknowledged working for Hoppe but said he knew nothing about the gas chambers.
The state court of Itzehoe, in northern Germany, said in a statement that the suspect allegedly ‘aided and instigated those responsible for the camp in the systematic murder of those imprisoned there between June 1943 and April 1945 in her role as stenographer. and typist in the field commander’s office. §§§
n.b. not a 'secretary'.
§§§ SS officer Paul Werner Hoppe, was convicted of his role in the camp and sentenced to nine years in prison by a West German court in 1957. He died in 1974.
As evidence during that investigation, given nearly 70 years ago, Furcher acknowledged working for Hoppe but said he knew nothing about the gas chambers.
The state court of Itzehoe, in northern Germany, said in a statement that the suspect allegedly ‘aided and instigated those responsible for the camp in the systematic murder of those imprisoned there between June 1943 and April 1945 in her role as stenographer. and typist in the field commander’s office. §§§
n.b. not a 'secretary'.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.