News0 min ago
Trial Of 96 Year Old Former Nazi Secretary
A former secretary at a Nazi concentration camp has been captured after trying to flee before her trial in northern Germany. Irmgard Furchner, 96, charged with complicity in 11,000 murders, fled her care home and failed to turn up at court. She has since been discovered and arrested and is awaiting trial.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/w orld-eu rope-58 747082
The question is should she stand trial after all these years and at her advanced age - or is it too late?
https:/
The question is should she stand trial after all these years and at her advanced age - or is it too late?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Every potential opportunity to shed light on what actually happened in WW2 should be seized and be fully exposed, AND be accessible to the Public. Any living witnesses can be a part in exposing the truth that the Public should know and have access to knowing, so she should give testimony as all living witnesses should.
N.B. ... except the Skripals, of course
N.B. ... except the Skripals, of course
I recall in the 80s being out for dinner with a group including a couple of Germans of our age, boomers. There had been a lot on the news about the search for some ex-Nazi and when I commented that it seemed a bit pointless after 40 years the Germans went crazy, No, they had to be sought out, they were very adament.
Looks like age is no bar to the prosecution of those accused of war crimes.
https:/ /editio n.cnn.c om/2021 /09/30/ europe/ german- 96-year -old-na zi-intl -grm/in dex.htm l
https:/
If a crime was committed many years ago, a sentence often no longer makes sense. For this reason, there is the so-called statute of limitations. After a certain period has elapsed, a criminal offence can no longer be prosecuted.
Excluded from the statute of limitations are particularly serious criminal offences such as murder, genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
As she, as an 18 year old typist, undoubtedly committed none of these crimes, this case should never have been pursued.
Excluded from the statute of limitations are particularly serious criminal offences such as murder, genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
As she, as an 18 year old typist, undoubtedly committed none of these crimes, this case should never have been pursued.
fiveleaves - // ... but I don't see any case in putting a 96 year old on trial. //
Then you appear in line with the argument that once a certain age is reached, justice need no longer be sought.
But that is a slippery slope.
Who decides what that 'cut-off' age is - and for what crimes?
Is it the same regardless of the crime?
The simplest way is for justice to follow its processes, and avoid sowing the seed of a notion that once a yet-to-be-determined age is reached, all justice is simply abandoned.
Then you appear in line with the argument that once a certain age is reached, justice need no longer be sought.
But that is a slippery slope.
Who decides what that 'cut-off' age is - and for what crimes?
Is it the same regardless of the crime?
The simplest way is for justice to follow its processes, and avoid sowing the seed of a notion that once a yet-to-be-determined age is reached, all justice is simply abandoned.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.