ChatterBank1 min ago
No Vaccine No Kidney - Discuss......
50 Answers
Answers
Kidneys are at a premium and should only be offered to patients with a best chance of survival. Post transplantat ion patients are immunosuppre ssed and are easy victims to non immunised infections, they would be a sitting duck for Covid. Seems reasonable to me.
12:24 Thu 07th Oct 2021
//Kidneys are at a premium and should only be offered to patients with a best chance of survival//
Do you totally believe that, sqad? One thing that bothers me about being a donor... is that my organs night well go to someone evil, like a child abuser, because he would last longer than a young mother....
Do you totally believe that, sqad? One thing that bothers me about being a donor... is that my organs night well go to someone evil, like a child abuser, because he would last longer than a young mother....
Yes I do pixie.
If we were "knee deep " in kidneys then fine, give them to the world and his uncle, but we aren't and the average wait for a transplant is 3 years.
You dish out the kidneys to those who have the best chance of a good result and a normal life.
The unvaccinated don't fall into that group.
If we were "knee deep " in kidneys then fine, give them to the world and his uncle, but we aren't and the average wait for a transplant is 3 years.
You dish out the kidneys to those who have the best chance of a good result and a normal life.
The unvaccinated don't fall into that group.
I agree with sqad.
However, the main thing for me is complete bafflement that someone prepared to have hugely invasive surgery and then take a cocktail of (very nasty) immunosuppressant drugs is jibbing at a simple vaccination that has been happily taken by billions of people.
There's a complete discontinuity of thinking going on in her head. That in itself makes me worry about how well she would cope with the rigorous process of post transplant behaviour and medication.
However, the main thing for me is complete bafflement that someone prepared to have hugely invasive surgery and then take a cocktail of (very nasty) immunosuppressant drugs is jibbing at a simple vaccination that has been happily taken by billions of people.
There's a complete discontinuity of thinking going on in her head. That in itself makes me worry about how well she would cope with the rigorous process of post transplant behaviour and medication.
MrG had the offer of a kidney from his sister and a friend of ours. The friend was a perfect match but at the last minute the doctors decided not to risk the chance of the living donor's kidney being affected as his own were.
Granted nobody else got the kidney but even with living donors there must be a duty not to waste a good kidney.
Granted nobody else got the kidney but even with living donors there must be a duty not to waste a good kidney.
I don’t think it’s about threatening her with her life. It’s about giving the kidney to a recipient with the best chance of survival. To require a potential recipient to be vaccinated is in one way the thin edge of the wedge but sometimes difficult and morally conflicting decisions have to be made. This is one such instance.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.