Donate SIGN UP

Rittenhouse Acquitted

Avatar Image
piggynose | 11:25 Sat 20th Nov 2021 | News
61 Answers
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-5935608

Its doesnt seem a popular verdict due to the riots. What do you think?
sorry if this has already been covered.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 61rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
12.39 old jusse?
I guess if you can call a thirty year war 'the troubles', you can call any minor skirmish whatever you like.
12:21 - //they're probably up in arms because if he'd been black he would have been convicted//

Not true. He would've been shot on sight by the police.
Piggie - Jussie Smollett, the black American actor who made up all kinds of BS about racist abuse and assaults he suffered.
Togo:.... // 18yr old boys carried guns,//
( that would be 1915 and 1940)

yeah but no but - they cdnt shoot just anyone ! come on fair's fair
they had to shoot Huns

1945 - my papa was asked as an officer to defend a trooper on a charge. Taxi rank - wasnt told what.
The trooper said: " I am the one that shot the Russki looter. It turns out he was in the Red Army. They are after my blood"

so it wasnt all, bamma lamma and then go home - 1940-5
blm erm you could have trial after trial, thye would not be happy until they get the result they want, so uch for democracy.
I think the media coverage of the trial and that of the courts decision reiterates my opinion that the media are not interested in the truth or facts.
So whoever shot David Dorn were only protestors,try telling that to his family.
Question Author
// the media are not interested in the truth or facts.//
court reporting ( like covid)
the fluffy little things ( Beeb hacks silly) just dont understand.

If you think of the appalling lack of grasp NJ has over covid it is almost forgivable that the hacks dont know diddly squat

Last week we had the hacks reporting that some one had been found guilty in a civil action
altho the term was used in the middle of C19 it is never used now and shows the hack didnt know civil from criminal

I agree with the protestors - he brought a firearm into a town in case there was trouble: caused trouble and used his firearm to prtect himself.

not sure if that wd get up and run here
I wonder if he had the same defence team as oj simpson?
I've seen pictures of 4 people who were cleared of murder in the US last week arguing self defence. One was white.
Kyle shouldn't have been trying to save his community from the criminal scum of the earth who deal in death and destruction with a bit of looting and arson thrown in. The police should.
Having watched the footage before the trial and again during the trial, I can honestly say that I have never seen a more clear-cut case of self defence in all my entire life. If Kyle had been found guilty on any one of the charges, it would have sounded the death knell for the USA as we know it.

Thank god the jury got it right. Not just for those in the USA, but for us all.
Peter Pedant “... [Rittenhouse] brought a firearm into a town in case there was trouble: caused trouble and used his firearm to prtect himself....”

And which planet are you inhabiting today Peter? It cannot be planet Earth, since your statement flagrantly contradicts the evidence.

Rittenhouse did not cause trouble. He did the exact opposite; he tried to prevent it. He was attempting to put out fires that were maliciously and deliberately started by Antifa / BLM rioters. It was his attempts to extinguish those fires that angered the rioters and lead to them to physically assault Rittenhouse and attempt to steal his weapon. Rittenhouse only fired upon those individuals as an absolute last resort. The video footage demonstrates this unequivocally. That is why the jury found him not guilty.

If you want to wallow in a fantasy world that Rittenhouse is guilty, then be my guest. But just know that the people who Rittenhouse shot were themselves violent criminals:

Grosskreutz, the man who Rittenhouse shot and wounded was a known felon and was illegally carrying a firearm. On the witness stand, he confirmed that Rittenhouse didn't shoot him until he (Grosskreutz) pointed his illegal firearm at Rittenhouse's head.

Huber, one of the men that Rittenhouse shot dead was also a convicted criminal. He pleaded guilty in 2013 to two felony counts of strangulation and suffocation and false imprisonment. Huber attempted to bludgeon Rittenhouse with a skateboard before Rittenhouse retaliated with justified lethal force.

And then there's Joseph Rosenbaum, the man who Rittenhouse first killed in self defence. Rosenbaum spent 12 years behind bars for raping children. Rosenbaum raped children between the ages of 9 and 11. He specifically targetted single women with kids so that he could carry out his evil actions.

And there you have it Peter. These are the people that Rittenhouse either killed or maimed. All of them were assaulting Rittenhouse. All of them were threatening the life of Rittenhouse.

And yet you, having access to all the video footage of the incident on multiple platforms, have reached the conclusion that it was Rittenhouse who was “causing trouble”...

My mind boggles at the mental gymnastics that you have to perform to conclude that Rittenhouse was in any way culpable for what happened that night. The jury saw through the prosecution's lies and misdirection.

And yet here you are, perpetuating lies. The truth of this case is crystal clear to anyone who can see the world without the tainture of politics warping their view of reality.

I pity you. I really do. Your political world-view has polluted your critical faculties to such an extent that you can now convince yourself to believe that black is white.
Geez, I'm glad I don't live in a country that allows vigilante teenagers to carry assault rifles into potentially dangerous situations with the intention of keeping peace.
But, according to some he was a fine upstanding citizen.
I take it you would be fine living in a society that allows criminals to smash up and burn your society then, Ozzy?


I think Rittenhouse was foolish and naïve and should have stayed at home but what Sven666 has posted is the truth...therefore in the diseased society that is the US he rightly has been found not guilty.
Sven seems like an AB plant to me to write huge illogical posts that clearly ignore all scientific knowledge n climate change and in this thread any appreciation of truth and the law just to generate more traffic on AB.
What inaccuracies has he/she typed out, bob?
Making him out as a nice guy who just wanted to be helpful to those around him. So all of it roy
You can see the pro trump and anti blm and anti Black and anti euth and anti Msm anti liberal posters a mile off on here all trying to bend the truth to fit there narrative

21 to 40 of 61rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Rittenhouse Acquitted

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.