ChatterBank2 mins ago
Has H R H Got A Get Out Of Jail Free Card
187 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-59857 168
I wonder if he has rediscovered the ability to sweat ?
No doubt he is !
I wonder if he has rediscovered the ability to sweat ?
No doubt he is !
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Stickybottle. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.douglas - // He's tried the salt of the earth, man of the people stuff in the interview but has now gone for his default "Do you know who I am?" //
To be accurate - these various defences have been offered by his obscenely expensive legal team.
A man without the wit to dress himself could not begin to defend his dog pooping on the pavement, much less something as life-changing for so many people as this case is becoming.
To be accurate - these various defences have been offered by his obscenely expensive legal team.
A man without the wit to dress himself could not begin to defend his dog pooping on the pavement, much less something as life-changing for so many people as this case is becoming.
AH //Then you are a cynical as he is, but at least you could never be accused of being a hypocrite.//
If you believe that all this isn't about money, then please explain what it IS about. No one has been 'abused' here, the woman was 17. I don't know at what age you started your sex-life, (or even if you have yet!)
Mine was well under way by that age.
If you believe that all this isn't about money, then please explain what it IS about. No one has been 'abused' here, the woman was 17. I don't know at what age you started your sex-life, (or even if you have yet!)
Mine was well under way by that age.
Some of the blame for Prince Andrew’s legal wrangling must lie with his legal team.
Imagine you find yourself in his position (guilty or not), your lawyers will recommend you do all that can be done in your defence – including making the case go away.
Unfortunately, the plaintiff then has additional expense paying their lawyers to represent them at any hearing attempting to have the case dismissed.
Sadly this is how the rich and famous make cases go away, where their accuser has no funds.
Imagine you find yourself in his position (guilty or not), your lawyers will recommend you do all that can be done in your defence – including making the case go away.
Unfortunately, the plaintiff then has additional expense paying their lawyers to represent them at any hearing attempting to have the case dismissed.
Sadly this is how the rich and famous make cases go away, where their accuser has no funds.
// If his legal team manage to get him off on a technicality he'll still not be exonerated in the eyes of the public.//
I agree with the rough idea of 'did he do it?' - but it boils down to some actions are criminal depending on the circumstances
and if the circumstances arent there - then he - sort of didnt do it
think 'flashing' ( OK in your house in the bog) or consorting with a leddy and paying her to kiss you ( aka prostitution), OK so long as she is over 16.
and yes I think G is looking for a second fee
and my attitudes towards this have been radically altered after being accused myself.
( esp the bit where you are invited to disprove allegations and you say, "er arent YOU meant to prove the allegations, and I am NOT obliged to help") and there is then lar-dee-lar about your 'duties' and in fact you dont have any. (duties)
I agree with the rough idea of 'did he do it?' - but it boils down to some actions are criminal depending on the circumstances
and if the circumstances arent there - then he - sort of didnt do it
think 'flashing' ( OK in your house in the bog) or consorting with a leddy and paying her to kiss you ( aka prostitution), OK so long as she is over 16.
and yes I think G is looking for a second fee
and my attitudes towards this have been radically altered after being accused myself.
( esp the bit where you are invited to disprove allegations and you say, "er arent YOU meant to prove the allegations, and I am NOT obliged to help") and there is then lar-dee-lar about your 'duties' and in fact you dont have any. (duties)
Blimey! The holier than thou strike again! When someone willingly meets with an ‘abuser’ three times I have my doubts that it was so very objectionable the first time. That girl wasn’t a child, she was available to travel to destinations around the world, and I suspect she was taking full advantage of the high life. Sure, call me cynical. I am.
Khandro - // AH //Then you are a cynical as he is, but at least you could never be accused of being a hypocrite.//
If you believe that all this isn't about money, then please explain what it IS about. No one has been 'abused' here, the woman was 17. I don't know at what age you started your sex-life, (or even if you have yet!) //
The age of the young woman in question is not the issue here.
As to whether or not anyone has been 'abused', that is for the court to decide, so I will choose to ignore your summary judgement, based on nothing more than your cynical judgement based on your own neanderthal attitudes to women.
I notice you have, as usual, ignored my demolition of your previously abysmally judged observations comparing your grandmother with the woman in question here.
The suggestion of hyopcrisy is similarly ignored as being too close to the truth to receive a response.
Mine was well under way by that age.
As to the time my own intimacies first occured, that is not something I am minded to discuss with you.
And as to your own grubby recollections of your encounters, and your perverse assumptions that everyone must have started at the same time as you, so therefore no 'abuse' has occurred, I am not minded to dignify such adolescent bragging piffle with any response whatsoever.
If you believe that all this isn't about money, then please explain what it IS about. No one has been 'abused' here, the woman was 17. I don't know at what age you started your sex-life, (or even if you have yet!) //
The age of the young woman in question is not the issue here.
As to whether or not anyone has been 'abused', that is for the court to decide, so I will choose to ignore your summary judgement, based on nothing more than your cynical judgement based on your own neanderthal attitudes to women.
I notice you have, as usual, ignored my demolition of your previously abysmally judged observations comparing your grandmother with the woman in question here.
The suggestion of hyopcrisy is similarly ignored as being too close to the truth to receive a response.
Mine was well under way by that age.
As to the time my own intimacies first occured, that is not something I am minded to discuss with you.
And as to your own grubby recollections of your encounters, and your perverse assumptions that everyone must have started at the same time as you, so therefore no 'abuse' has occurred, I am not minded to dignify such adolescent bragging piffle with any response whatsoever.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.