Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 114rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
In 2018 when Amber Rudd was in charge there were just 299 channel crossings.

Last year, under Priti Patel that rose to 28,000 and 4,600 so far this year.

She is a disaster.

//sorry - I think you need a different form of words.//

Resettlement?
//In 2018 when Amber Rudd was in charge there were just 299 channel crossings. Last year, under Priti Patel that rose to 28,000 and 4,600 so far this year.//

The production & sale of rubber dinghies has increased exponentially!
Dave, you're right. I misunderstood the meaning of the word, I thought it was to settle in another country, not necessarily the one of origin. Resettlement is definitely the word I was looking for.

Apologies for the misunderstanding.
// The production & sale of rubber dinghies has increased exponentially! //

Utter rubbish.
that was nearly 2 years ago, there must be now thousands
1) because it is spelt wrong - one 'n'
2) it is obviously pits

end of - - who is it who says that the whole time, usually inappropriately always gormlessly
Question Author
gromit: "It might be thriving economically, but it is not a thriving democracy. " - well it is a democracy and it is thriving so how in gromitspeak is that not a thriving democracy?
Question Author
gromit: "In 2018 when Amber Rudd was in charge there were just 299 channel crossings.

Last year, under Priti Patel that rose to 28,000 and 4,600 so far this year.

She is a disaster. " - so what has been different then? What has Patel done that has increased theses numbers?
Stop asking sensible questions TTT.
//We copied the Aussies, their plan was ok. Why is ours any different?//
No, not quite.
It wasn't ok.
Possibly the Aussies didn't send people to Rwanda.
Apart from the above, why indeed.
At least you're not trying to send your unwanted here anymore.
I have still not heard of any alternative suggestions from those who think this is a bad idea.
And you wont Davebro, its easy to be a critic not so easy to come up with your own workable ideas.

Still, lets see maybe one of the Tory haters will come up with something that isnt just let all the illegals in.
Machine gun posts and killer dogs would be a lot cheaper eh?

Not really but it's what you're leaning towards innit? Cheap and cheerful, just don't ask me to do it guv.
And the dogs would feed themselves.

Win, win situation.
Sharks ?
How about we just play Barry Manilow songs loudly,all day and everyday along the south coast of England?Thats bound to be a powerful deterrent.
Good idea, if that doesn't work.
RICK ROLL them.
Never gonna give you up
From what I see most of them are younger men who are moving, in all probability, for richer fields to rob rather than stay and sort their own country out.

61 to 80 of 114rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Why Is Our Plan "Unnacceptable"?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.