News1 min ago
I Would Still Like To Know
why Putin refers to his Ukrainian opponents as nazis. What does he mean by the word nazi? It was the National Socialist Party of Germany I thought.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Stargazer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The definition of 'Nazi' can be extended beyond referring to membership of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. From the OED:
"In extended use: a believer in or sympathizer with the aims or doctrines of Nazism or any similar doctrines. Also more generally: a person holding extreme racist (esp. anti-Semitic) or authoritarian views, or behaving in a brutal and bigoted manner."
Putin's (pseudo-) justification for attacking 'Nazis' is the inclusion of the neo-Nazi Azov regiment within Ukraine's military forces:
https:/ /www.al jazeera .com/ne ws/2022 /3/1/wh o-are-t he-azov -regime nt
"In extended use: a believer in or sympathizer with the aims or doctrines of Nazism or any similar doctrines. Also more generally: a person holding extreme racist (esp. anti-Semitic) or authoritarian views, or behaving in a brutal and bigoted manner."
Putin's (pseudo-) justification for attacking 'Nazis' is the inclusion of the neo-Nazi Azov regiment within Ukraine's military forces:
https:/
well there is this little matter of the Nazi Soviet pact summer 1939.
After the starvation of the 1920s engineered by Stalin
Ukraine er welcomed the Nazis with open arms as liberators
Some men joined the Wehrmacht others staffed the nearby 'concentration camps' - as Jannie Van der Hoosit said about collaborating ( he did time) in amsterdam: you had to live and the Germans paid....
The Germans in their turn treated them with the utmost brutality.
Then the red army came
and a further hundreds of thousands to the Gulags for collaboration ( the whole of the tatars of Crimea, that is why they are now all Russian, geddit?)
Also - - Putin likes Stalin - good man, had some good points.
As an antidote watch The Death of Stalin - it is a British comedy and the actors all had a glorious time making it. [Sergei Khrushchev sniffed: this is not a subject to make a comedy about]
After the starvation of the 1920s engineered by Stalin
Ukraine er welcomed the Nazis with open arms as liberators
Some men joined the Wehrmacht others staffed the nearby 'concentration camps' - as Jannie Van der Hoosit said about collaborating ( he did time) in amsterdam: you had to live and the Germans paid....
The Germans in their turn treated them with the utmost brutality.
Then the red army came
and a further hundreds of thousands to the Gulags for collaboration ( the whole of the tatars of Crimea, that is why they are now all Russian, geddit?)
Also - - Putin likes Stalin - good man, had some good points.
As an antidote watch The Death of Stalin - it is a British comedy and the actors all had a glorious time making it. [Sergei Khrushchev sniffed: this is not a subject to make a comedy about]
Short answer: he's a liar making an emotional appeal - facts don't matter.
Long answer: https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Post- truth_p olitics
Long answer: https:/
> People should be aware that a lot of attrocities against the Jews in WW2 was carried out by Ukranians
> Not just the Ukranians. The complicity of the French was something I was only just getting to the bottom of when I left there
And for that matter the Germans themselves. In other words, if you're going to say WWII is relevant, you might as well say that Putin would be justified in invading Germany ...
> Not just the Ukranians. The complicity of the French was something I was only just getting to the bottom of when I left there
And for that matter the Germans themselves. In other words, if you're going to say WWII is relevant, you might as well say that Putin would be justified in invading Germany ...