News1 min ago
Oh Dear Sir Kier
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
'When it emerged in May 2020 that Mr Cummings had travelled from London to Durham during the UK’s first lockdown, Durham Police released a statement which said: “In line with Durham constabulary’s general approach throughout the pandemic, there is no intention to take retrospective action in respect of the Barnard Castle incident since this would amount to treating Mr Cummings differently from other members of the public.
“Durham constabulary has not taken retrospective action against any other person.”'
“Durham constabulary has not taken retrospective action against any other person.”'
^^^which is exactly why he said he’d offer his resignation if fined - knowing full well there won’t be a fine.
He refused to answer the question as to whether he would offer his resignation if not fined, but found to have breached the rules.
People have spun his offer to tender his resignation if fined as being “honourable”, but given he knows he won’t be fined, it’s an empty gesture and not honourable…but it’s managed to fool some people on this site.
He refused to answer the question as to whether he would offer his resignation if not fined, but found to have breached the rules.
People have spun his offer to tender his resignation if fined as being “honourable”, but given he knows he won’t be fined, it’s an empty gesture and not honourable…but it’s managed to fool some people on this site.
Why did the Prime Minister not offer his resignation at any stage during the ‘No, no party oh wait yes there was but all guidance was followed but actually it wasn’t and the government were getting leathered regularly during lockdowns and we abused the minions for fun’ escape and evasion exercise we witnessed?
So many unanswered questions persist.
So many unanswered questions persist.
Boris lied to parliament about the parties. Starmer was asking him to resign because he lied, not because he broke the rules. Starmer was prepared to wait for the results of the report, but knew, as many did, that Boris was lying. Starmer did not lie about his after work curry. I am not Political, neither Tory nor Labour.
Nom, why aren’t you asking why the PM made several denials, lied about what had occurred, even told the House that there was no party on the 13th of November when he was subsequently found to have been present, then had to backtrack about everything?
I don’t really care about Starmer, by offering his immediate resignation if found to be in breach of the law he took the sting out of the whole story, I’m more interested in the PM, who made all the rules and with whom the buck stops. Inexplicably, the parliamentary standards committee think the same.
Why would they do that?
Or maybe the PM just attracts that sort of scrutiny because of his scurrilous behaviour throughout his career?
But of course you won’t see that, he’s a god to you.
I don’t really care about Starmer, by offering his immediate resignation if found to be in breach of the law he took the sting out of the whole story, I’m more interested in the PM, who made all the rules and with whom the buck stops. Inexplicably, the parliamentary standards committee think the same.
Why would they do that?
Or maybe the PM just attracts that sort of scrutiny because of his scurrilous behaviour throughout his career?
But of course you won’t see that, he’s a god to you.
