Shopping & Style0 min ago
Penny Steps Closer To No 10.....
72 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think I could put up with that nonsense if she restores Conservative policies and values to the Party, naomi. The "trans" nonsense will die a natural death when people realise that it affects only about one in two hundred people (if that) and there is no need for any special arrangements to be made for them. It simply needs sporting bodies to prevent men who are pretending to be women from participating in women's sport under any circumstances. The rest will wither on the vine.
Far more important is the restoration of a small State, with low taxes and low public spending, and the ditching of the ludicrous "Net Zero" energy policies.
Far more important is the restoration of a small State, with low taxes and low public spending, and the ditching of the ludicrous "Net Zero" energy policies.
naomi: "And TTT, you've shouted as loudly as anyone - of not louder - about this - and suddenly it's ok? How come?" - it's not ok it's something I don't agree with but then again I don't expect every Tory to agree 100% with all my views. I doubt I agree 100% with every view of any of the candidates. Even TGL had ideas that I did not agree with but overall I can accept deviation on minor issues for the overall package.
Oh that's a shame.
I like her, I especially liked how she utterly humiliated Rayner, completely destroyed her Rayner's points, and showed her up for the intellectual and political pygmy she is.
However...
I cannot agree that perpetuating the absurd myth that biological men are women is a minor issue; on the contrary, I think it's a big issue, so I'm saddened she's taken that stance. She may well have done so get the very tiny, but very vocal and bullying minority on side, but it doesn't make it right.
I want a Tory leader who feels the same as me, that is to say low taxation, little interference and small 'g' Government - basically I want to keep more of my money.
There's not a single Government in the world, no matter what their hue, who can spend my money more wisely than I can; Governments are inherently wasteful, by dint of the simple fact they're spending other people's money.
If she promised me I would be able to keep more of my money, chances are I'd overlook the lie she's perpetuating (I've never made any secret that I'd vote for anybody/party who would let me keep more of my money for me and mine), but until/unless that happens, I'm dissapointed in her stance.
I like her, I especially liked how she utterly humiliated Rayner, completely destroyed her Rayner's points, and showed her up for the intellectual and political pygmy she is.
However...
I cannot agree that perpetuating the absurd myth that biological men are women is a minor issue; on the contrary, I think it's a big issue, so I'm saddened she's taken that stance. She may well have done so get the very tiny, but very vocal and bullying minority on side, but it doesn't make it right.
I want a Tory leader who feels the same as me, that is to say low taxation, little interference and small 'g' Government - basically I want to keep more of my money.
There's not a single Government in the world, no matter what their hue, who can spend my money more wisely than I can; Governments are inherently wasteful, by dint of the simple fact they're spending other people's money.
If she promised me I would be able to keep more of my money, chances are I'd overlook the lie she's perpetuating (I've never made any secret that I'd vote for anybody/party who would let me keep more of my money for me and mine), but until/unless that happens, I'm dissapointed in her stance.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.