How it Works1 min ago
The Donald Is Back!
Great speech, straight from the heart, no baloney, & no autocue. Sleepy Joe, be afraid.
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ video/d onald-t rump-fo rmer-us -presid ent-giv es-his- first-s peech-i n-washi ngton-d c-since -leavin g-offic e-12659 735
https:/
Answers
The voters in America will once again have to make a choice. It will not be influenced by the narcissist rage of a few wannabe opinion brokers on an obscure website in a foreign Country. They will have to choose between a candidate with a brash and and guileless personality who has America's best interests, and therefor theirs, at heart and as the core of his...
18:53 Wed 27th Jul 2022
A couple of naughty words in the text, prepare the smelling salts, but the clip is only two minutes long.
For the record he's using autocue. :-)
An orationer of expert expertness in the speaking word:
https:/ /www.th eatlant ic.com/ culture /archiv e/2022/ 07/ode- trump-s peech-o uttakes -jan-6- capitol -riot/6 70943/
For the record he's using autocue. :-)
An orationer of expert expertness in the speaking word:
https:/
" Question Author
Whether he made America 'great' again is a matter of judgement, but it was a hell of a lot better then than it is now under this administration. Everything he says is correct, the borders, employment, gun crime, homelessness, inflation, dependence on other counties for energy & more.
This lot tried for two years, spending huge sums on lawyers & investigative journos to link him to having some untoward connections to Russia, what did they find? - zilch! and they will find zilch in this enquiry.
"
How is the US now more dependent on energy from abroad?. If anything its less having binned Russian oil. And Trump's finances are inextricably bound up in loans from dirty Russian money from a variety of sources tho almost certainly all originating from the Kremlin (which owns the entirety of Russia now)
Whether he made America 'great' again is a matter of judgement, but it was a hell of a lot better then than it is now under this administration. Everything he says is correct, the borders, employment, gun crime, homelessness, inflation, dependence on other counties for energy & more.
This lot tried for two years, spending huge sums on lawyers & investigative journos to link him to having some untoward connections to Russia, what did they find? - zilch! and they will find zilch in this enquiry.
"
How is the US now more dependent on energy from abroad?. If anything its less having binned Russian oil. And Trump's finances are inextricably bound up in loans from dirty Russian money from a variety of sources tho almost certainly all originating from the Kremlin (which owns the entirety of Russia now)
naomi24
//Not at all, fatticusinch. I just think your audience should be aware that you consider yourself to be a social influencer. :o)//
Your words not mine but thanks for being a part of it and your continued following, despite your protestations that you never read what I write, your devotion is appreciated.
//Not at all, fatticusinch. I just think your audience should be aware that you consider yourself to be a social influencer. :o)//
Your words not mine but thanks for being a part of it and your continued following, despite your protestations that you never read what I write, your devotion is appreciated.
"A 'surprise witness' (I wonder who paid her?) says she heard so & so say such & such so he must have known - blah blah. "
it was not just her, and there was a bit more to it than that khandro...
I'm also curious about JDavis question... do you believe that the democrats stole the 2020 election and if so do you believe the actions of the Jan 6th rioters were justified?
it was not just her, and there was a bit more to it than that khandro...
I'm also curious about JDavis question... do you believe that the democrats stole the 2020 election and if so do you believe the actions of the Jan 6th rioters were justified?
// it was not just her, and there was a bit more to it than that khandro...//
intittled: you clearly have been in the same situation as myself
" so and so said XYZ and this is very serious indeed. You must respond to these very serious allegations ( ie refute them ) or else we will take them as true..."
and then when you try "ABC" - you get "what tommy rot, who is gonna believe that? Do you have any evidence for ABC, oh by the way we didnt do that to so=and-so about what HE said"
intittled: you clearly have been in the same situation as myself
" so and so said XYZ and this is very serious indeed. You must respond to these very serious allegations ( ie refute them ) or else we will take them as true..."
and then when you try "ABC" - you get "what tommy rot, who is gonna believe that? Do you have any evidence for ABC, oh by the way we didnt do that to so=and-so about what HE said"
It’s ok Peter Pedant, you know how Naomi is.
She’s struggling with the distinction between influencing a small social circle and being a social influencer in the mainstream sense.
She tends to go for such diversions instead of answering the questions put to her over certain idiotic stances, but you knew that.
She’s struggling with the distinction between influencing a small social circle and being a social influencer in the mainstream sense.
She tends to go for such diversions instead of answering the questions put to her over certain idiotic stances, but you knew that.
Corby //are you seriously saying there was no inflation in America when Trump left office?//
And are re you trying to be obtuse? Of course there was inflation, neither he nor I says there wasn't - where did you get that from?
What he says that it is much worse now than it was then, - perfectly true, as is the thousands flocking in across the Mexican border, unemployment & all the other things.
And are re you trying to be obtuse? Of course there was inflation, neither he nor I says there wasn't - where did you get that from?
What he says that it is much worse now than it was then, - perfectly true, as is the thousands flocking in across the Mexican border, unemployment & all the other things.
The voters in America will once again have to make a choice. It will not be influenced by the narcissist rage of a few wannabe opinion brokers on an obscure website in a foreign Country. They will have to choose between a candidate with a brash and and guileless personality who has America's best interests, and therefor theirs, at heart and as the core of his being. He is a political outsider and does not follow the mores and tacit agreements that have been secretly melded over the decades that benefit the politicians and media but cheat the public. One candidate, by his previous actions, has exposed to the World this dangerous manipulation of opinion and their other choice will be someone who would rather that cosy contract of corruption and deceit is continued. That is why the US media and their boot lickers are in a blind panic.