Jobs & Education2 mins ago
The Donald Is Back!
Great speech, straight from the heart, no baloney, & no autocue. Sleepy Joe, be afraid.
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ video/d onald-t rump-fo rmer-us -presid ent-giv es-his- first-s peech-i n-washi ngton-d c-since -leavin g-offic e-12659 735
https:/
Answers
The voters in America will once again have to make a choice. It will not be influenced by the narcissist rage of a few wannabe opinion brokers on an obscure website in a foreign Country. They will have to choose between a candidate with a brash and and guileless personality who has America's best interests, and therefor theirs, at heart and as the core of his...
18:53 Wed 27th Jul 2022
The real cheating in the 2020 election — and every other election in recent memory — wasn’t that Iran, China or Chavez were manipulating our voting machines. It wasn’t the ballot harvesting allegedly exposed in Dinesh D’Souza’s movie, 2,000 Mules. It was what liberals were doing right in front of our faces.
Democrats have what are known as “unmotivated voters.” As such, they need battalions of “Get Out the Vote” activists to track down the bored and the lazy. (Yes, the same marginalized people whom liberals claim are having their lifelong dreams of voting dashed by GOP “voter suppression” schemes can’t be bothered to get out of bed on Election Day.)
Over the years, Democrats have lured their voters to the polls with a free ride, a box lunch and walking-around money — even a gurney, if that’s what it takes. Volunteers give the voters detailed, childlike instructions on exactly how to fill out their ballots. Luckily, unionized government workers have plenty of time on their hands to “organize” voters.
This link disputes the claims made in the "2,000 mules" film.
https:/ /www.re uters.c om/arti cle/fac tcheck- usa-mul es-idUS L2N2XJ0 OQ
https:/
JDavis ; //So, to clarify, do you believe the election was unlawfully stolen and do you believe the Capitol rioters acted independently of Trump?//
Two questions: (1) I don't know, and neither do you, but probably not.
(2) They certainly acted independently of Trump, because he wasn't there, & this enquiry will never be able to prove his personal culpability for what the mob did.
Two questions: (1) I don't know, and neither do you, but probably not.
(2) They certainly acted independently of Trump, because he wasn't there, & this enquiry will never be able to prove his personal culpability for what the mob did.
No, I wasn't there but prefer to believe the lawcourts which found no evidence of fraud and dismissed over 50 claims from Trump and his camp.
And there is taped evidence of a Trump phone call to Georgia's top elections official, asking him to 'find'around 12 thousand votes to overturn the result.
You must be desperate to claim Trump is not implicated because he wasn't there personally. The transcript of his speech (rant, Naomi?)
shows it was extremely inflammatory and ended with 'So let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.' Court testimony, which I have no reason to disbelieve, says Trump was unconcerned by the violence (as the rioters were on his side) and indifferent to the fact that Mike Pence might be lynched.
I notice you've also said 'they won't be able to prove his personal culpability' which is hardly resounding support for his innocence.
I cannot believe that you seriously think this man is fit to be President.
And there is taped evidence of a Trump phone call to Georgia's top elections official, asking him to 'find'around 12 thousand votes to overturn the result.
You must be desperate to claim Trump is not implicated because he wasn't there personally. The transcript of his speech (rant, Naomi?)
shows it was extremely inflammatory and ended with 'So let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.' Court testimony, which I have no reason to disbelieve, says Trump was unconcerned by the violence (as the rioters were on his side) and indifferent to the fact that Mike Pence might be lynched.
I notice you've also said 'they won't be able to prove his personal culpability' which is hardly resounding support for his innocence.
I cannot believe that you seriously think this man is fit to be President.
JDavis; In other words, - nothing there of any consequence, & certainly nothing which could lead to incrimination.
The biggest crime that the AB moral philosophers seem to be able to come up with is that he was reading his splendid speech from an autocue !
And, (brace yourself) yes, along with 75 million Americans, (probably more now) I think he's fit to be president.
The biggest crime that the AB moral philosophers seem to be able to come up with is that he was reading his splendid speech from an autocue !
And, (brace yourself) yes, along with 75 million Americans, (probably more now) I think he's fit to be president.
"The biggest crime that the AB moral philosophers seem to be able to come up with is that he was reading his splendid speech from an autocue !"
i think you'll find it was YOU who put it as one of his biggest assets, not the other way round.
I see you did not respond to my point about "world's securest border" or washington DCs gun laws It just makes it difficult to sympathise with your POV or take you sriously when you say things that either dont seem to be true or completely ignore people's responses/questions to you. It's perfectly ok for you not to of course, but as i say it makes it difficult to take you seriously
i think you'll find it was YOU who put it as one of his biggest assets, not the other way round.
I see you did not respond to my point about "world's securest border" or washington DCs gun laws It just makes it difficult to sympathise with your POV or take you sriously when you say things that either dont seem to be true or completely ignore people's responses/questions to you. It's perfectly ok for you not to of course, but as i say it makes it difficult to take you seriously
JDavis; //Even though it's on record that he tried to fix the last election?//
Which 'record' is that ?
He didn't try to "fix" the election, he believed, rightly or wrongly, that the result indicated some fraud had taken place.
Typical of Trump, that's how he is, everyone knows that, and saying so isn't a crime.
Read Togo's BA
Which 'record' is that ?
He didn't try to "fix" the election, he believed, rightly or wrongly, that the result indicated some fraud had taken place.
Typical of Trump, that's how he is, everyone knows that, and saying so isn't a crime.
Read Togo's BA