Editor's Blog6 mins ago
New P M Will Be Appointed At Balmoral
23 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-62728 328
Very sporting of Her Majesty to give the Scots a chance to welcome Mrs Flip-Flop with a baptism of fire.
Very sporting of Her Majesty to give the Scots a chance to welcome Mrs Flip-Flop with a baptism of fire.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FatticusInch. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// She should assert her authority and say..... //
she has very little latitude here - the Prime Minister is invited by the head of state to be the head of the Government, and holds that position by virtue of his or her ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons. Johnson cannot be PM as he doesn't command that confidence.
she has very little latitude here - the Prime Minister is invited by the head of state to be the head of the Government, and holds that position by virtue of his or her ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons. Johnson cannot be PM as he doesn't command that confidence.
//If I have the authority to "appoint" someone (or not) I think I can decide who gets the job - yes?//
No. It's explained above who the Queen appoints as PM and why. If it's still unclear, have a read of this (especially from "How does the Queen know who to appoint?" onwards):
https:/ /www.in stitute forgove rnment. org.uk/ explain ers/app ointmen t-prime -minist ers
No. It's explained above who the Queen appoints as PM and why. If it's still unclear, have a read of this (especially from "How does the Queen know who to appoint?" onwards):
https:/
The monarchy has no power Davebro. If the Queen actually tried to use any of her supposed authority to interfere in the workings of govt - refusing to accept BJs resignation, or inviting Truss to form a govt for example - it would just be overruled and you wouldn't even get to hear about it.
I know you know this, but some people don't seem to.
I know you know this, but some people don't seem to.
But didn't the Australian Governor - acting for the crown - interfere heavily in their politics?
//On 11 November 1975, Governor-General Sir John Kerr terminated Gough Whitlam's appointment as Prime Minister of Australia. At 1.00pm on 11 November 1975, Governor-General Sir John Kerr handed a letter to Gough Whitlam terminating his appointment as Prime Minister of Australia.//
//On 11 November 1975, Governor-General Sir John Kerr terminated Gough Whitlam's appointment as Prime Minister of Australia. At 1.00pm on 11 November 1975, Governor-General Sir John Kerr handed a letter to Gough Whitlam terminating his appointment as Prime Minister of Australia.//
There are some ignormauses on here who just don't understand the relationship of monarch and parliament and how it has evolved over the ages.
Let's really upset them by stating that the monarch is the owner of all land in the UK......it's where the expression 'freehold' comes from - a free hold on the defined land from the monarch. Makes CPOs much easier in law too.
Let's really upset them by stating that the monarch is the owner of all land in the UK......it's where the expression 'freehold' comes from - a free hold on the defined land from the monarch. Makes CPOs much easier in law too.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.