Society & Culture20 mins ago
State Pension
Will the triple lock system be Sunaks "Hot Potato" ??.
I think it will be his and his partys downfall .Triple lock is going to be a major issue , but no one wants to discuss it. Sunak,Hunt and DWP Secretary have refused comment or address the issue ,but you can bet your life they are cooking something up between them that will be no advantage to Pensioners.
.
I think it will be his and his partys downfall .Triple lock is going to be a major issue , but no one wants to discuss it. Sunak,Hunt and DWP Secretary have refused comment or address the issue ,but you can bet your life they are cooking something up between them that will be no advantage to Pensioners.
.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//now it has reached the 10,000 signature threshold ,it has to trigger a Govt response. //
Which could be 'don't call us we'll call you', or something similar. Only after 100,000 signatures are issues 'considered' for debate in parliament so that isn't set in stone either.
https:/ /www.go v.uk/pe tition- governm ent
It seems to me that the pensioners who are worst off are those who have small private pensions that take their income just over the level at which they can claim extra benefits. Those who are able to claim are not badly off at all.
Which could be 'don't call us we'll call you', or something similar. Only after 100,000 signatures are issues 'considered' for debate in parliament so that isn't set in stone either.
https:/
It seems to me that the pensioners who are worst off are those who have small private pensions that take their income just over the level at which they can claim extra benefits. Those who are able to claim are not badly off at all.
What makes you think I know how to claim benefits, Gulliver? I know people who are in the position I've mentioned - and I also know women who receive full state pension despite never having worked since having their children about 50 years ago - whereas others who went back to work and continued to pay their dues receive drastically reduced amounts because they are contributions short. Something very cock-eyed with that system.
um- yes she ( Ros that is!) says she does - it does, whatever
https:/ /www.in depende ntage.o rg/poun ds-shil ling-an d-pensi ons/rol e-of-st ate/wom en-poor -relati ons
https:/
Naomi 08.39 Thank you for understanding this. I am in that position. I stayed at home to raise my 2 children until primary school age (did private tutoring to help pay the housekeeping) and then returned to work. Because of the age it was I paid Married Woman's whatever-it-was, but when I returned to work I paid full contributions. Because of my age I 'retired' on a smaller pension anyway. As a result, my state pension is nowhere near what people think it is. Maybe I'll take up tutoring again if they ditch the triple lock. :)
Jourdain, I think there are a lot of women who now regret trying to do the right thing - juggling child care to provide for their families without depending upon state hand-outs, and continuing to contribute financially to the system, only to watch others reap the rewards of a lifetime of idleness. I don't know who worked this system out but whoever it was should have been sacked.
//biggest bugbear...(cut)... A person earning 100,000 pa will pay (at this year's rates) about 5.2 times as much NI//
It's likely those on £20k would gladly swap places.
Moreover, the playing field is levelled since
top earners can contribute vastly much more money into their chosen private pension scheme.
It's likely those on £20k would gladly swap places.
Moreover, the playing field is levelled since
top earners can contribute vastly much more money into their chosen private pension scheme.