Donate SIGN UP

Hunt For On-The-Run Asylum Seeker

Avatar Image
fender62 | 18:45 Thu 17th Nov 2022 | News
213 Answers
gobsmacked is not the word, begining of a giant iceberg for the uk, sadly we will become like sweden, and there rape explosion let alone gangsterism, anyone disagree.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11435497/Asylum-seeker-investigation-offence-run-fleeing-police.html
Gravatar

Answers

161 to 180 of 213rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
no they are not.
// Zebu, they’re coming from France. They’re not being persecuted. //

This flies in the face of those Albanians whom have been granted British visas.

To all OPs in doubt of the plight of some of these Albanians...

"One cannot even begin to conceive what it must be like to live in a narco state! "

Nonsense. People coming here on small boats from France are coming from a safe country.
you have to admit that France IS a safe country... so why make the journey, because we are a soft touch is why, i am so bloody fed up with this mess, why won't the government send them back to Albania.
If you had any relatives who emigrated to Australia, say, in the 1960s, or Canada, in the 70s and 80s, they were economic migrants, going from a safe country. OK, the receiving countries were keen to have them, but you cannot just condemn the idea of economic migration outright.
// but you cannot just condemn the idea of economic migration outright.//

No one has. We are rightly condemning uncontrolled, illegal, "economic" migration. Illegal migration controlled by people traffickers and gangsters that is intended to deliver more of the same to our society.
//why won't the government send them back to Albania//

In September of this year alone, more than 500 migrants were deported. 100+ of which were Albanian.

During BoJo's term in office, over 80% of claims made by Albanians were successful.

You're probably now asking, why?

The British system of immigration can distinguish that not all who come here from Albania are economic migrants. Each case is judged on its own merits!

As you might imagine, living in a narco state will inevitably lead to some of its citizens being disenfranchised. Persecuted even.

BoJo's government presided over a system that was to identify some Albanians were in genuine need of our help.

Why are you unable to reason this?
why do you think it's a narco state? also why can't you understand that we will have to feed, house these people at a time when so many British people are struggling to do the same. House and feed our own homeless first and foremost.
i don't understand why you want them here, i really don't.
// don't understand why you want them here, i really don't. //

Only those who are eligible and satisfy the criteria of refugee status. Those that do not - deportation!
//Nonsense.//

So you have lived in a narco country?

// People coming here on small boats from France are coming from a safe country. //

Few would dispute this.

Instead of waving your admonishing finger at those migrants who have been successful, shake your fist at BoJo.

Of course, you won't.
i would shake my fist at anyone who permitted this debacle.
Zebu, // People coming here on small boats from France are coming from a safe country. //

////Few would dispute this. ////

So stop the purposefully emotive hand-wringing about desperate people fleeing to safety. They're not. Not a single one of them..

//Instead of waving your admonishing finger at those migrants who have been successful, shake your fist at BoJo.//

Why? I seem to recall the unnamed, unelected judges of the ECHR once again overriding the ruling of our own courts and blocking efforts to extract illegals.

Meanwhile, not only are they costing us a fortune and putting services under severe strain, we now have the dubious pleasure of long-eradicated diseases being reintroduced into this country - the latest Diphtheria. Lucky us, eh! You may worm and squirm and change tack as much as you like but the simple fact is these people are not fleeing danger and their presence here offers no benefit whatsoever to this country. Quite the reverse.
// costing us a fortune //

No need to fret. It works out to less than 5 times the foreign aid budget. Just a tiny fraction of our GDP.

// Diphtheria. Lucky us, eh! //

More grounds to support our foreign aid budget. Tackling diseases at source. i.e., the country where these pathogens are born. Boris on the otherhand, chose to slash our overseas aid.

// blocking efforts to extract illegals.//

Since the grace period expired in the summer of last year, post Brexit, we havnt been able to get a sausage into Northern Ireland. What chance of getting a full grown adult into Rwanda? Flawed policy laid firmly at the feet of BoJo.

//Why?...{cut}...overriding the ruling of our own courts //

So no apportionment of blame on BoJo's ineffective measures in preventing migrants coming here in the first place.... Throwing money at the French. Another BoJo flawed policy.

Are there no lengths you will not go to in defending the theatrical bumbling of BoJo's record?

To protect his inadequacy you're prepared to play a part, any part, except that of a mute!
is why, i am so bloody fed up with this mess,

fie fie - some not very mimsy thoughts on this thread - from the leaders of Mimz - is it really appropriate for AB ?

I only ask because that was er exactly what was said to me - on the subject of the death of famous scientist Luc Montagnier - not mimsy to mention death - and out it went!

non sequitur - and AB it is never to early for a non-sequitur of howling proportions - one immigrant is a rapist, so all are

ho hum - AB - BA shows both faces (5) - Janus
// unelected judges of the ECHR //

Who has told you that nonsense?

// these people are not fleeing danger //

Home Office statistics say otherwise.
Are there no lengths you will not go to in defending the theatrical bumbling of BoJo's record?

yeah but no but

I note BoJO is silent ( as custom demands) but the er supporters are out in full flare !
Zebu, it’s said that attack is the best form of defence but for that to be effective a cogent argument, something you clearly don’t have, is essential. You're hurtling headlong from one illogical - and irrelevant - argument to the next and contradicting yourself along the way. May I suggest that should you wish to launch into yet another foray, you construct your rhetoric a little more astutely beforehand because as it is you’re not coming across as entirely rational.
The only way to stop illegal immigration is to create the situation whereby such people don't want to come here. Either turn them round or let them in and put them in open fields, unfed, unclothed, unsheltered until they die. Then, bulldoze the bodies into mass graves.
Naomi, Thank you for your last post.
I shall waste no time in reading it.


Look! Understandably it's a slap in the face for those who voted Brexit. To seize back control of UK borders and reduce mass immigration. However this is by far the whole story,

The positive impact of immigration on the UK economy is undeniable. There are currently over one million jobs that remain (apologies if that is a dirty word in your vocabulary) vacant.

From your penultimate post, you raised concerns about cost and infrastructure. There is little credence in those who hold views regarding this. For the rhetoric is always one of gross exaggeration.

To promote UK growth is the way forward. Getting people into work, to fill those vacant posts. If you want a robust infrastructure, then growth is the answer.

Sadly over many decades, public services have been underfunded, hence the decline in standards.

On a brighter note and not before time, housing issues are at last being addressed. There are new build programs going on nationwide. This along with the conversion and renovation of old buildings, particularly on brown field sites, thus providing more accommodation like we havn't seen before.

Unfortunately you have allowed yourself to become indoctrinated by a populist newspaper. Its sole aim to sensationalise at every opportunity in the hope of increasing its circulation.

Unwittingly you have fallen into its readership.

161 to 180 of 213rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Hunt For On-The-Run Asylum Seeker

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.