What Do Think, Are We Ready To Let Her Back Here ?

[Bobbisox1]

https://news.sky.com/story/is-bride-shamima-begums-appeal-to-restore-uk-citizenship-to-begin-in-london-court-12752158

Who’s paying for these appeals? ( answers on a postcard)
It looks like the photo on the right has been photoshopped

[emmie]

how do you know they were indoctrinated.

[1ozzy]

Kill the cause

[emmie]

we couldn't kill the cause, ISIS took a hold and never let go,

[emmie]

anyway i have said all i intend to on this matter.

[1ozzy]

Seriously Em?

[emmie]

yes

[1ozzy]

Ok

[naomi24]

She’s not a teenager who screwed up. She was raised with radical Islam. Her father has been filmed at meetings of radical Islamists. Her new sense of fashion designed specifically to deceive (Islam allows that) should fool no one. She knew exactly what she was getting into.

[1ozzy]

//She’s not a teenager who screwed up. She was raised with radical Islam. Her father has been filmed at meetings of radical Islamists//

No wonder the kid screwed up.

[1ozzy]

Maybe it's the father that requires punishment?

[naomi24]

She’s not a one off by any means. She should be kept out - but she won’t be. The useful idiots will see to that.

[1ozzy]

Will the useful idiots pursue the parent that caused the problem?

Doubt it

[naomi24]

He’s not a one off either - but I don’t think we can do anything about his political/religious ideology so I can’t imagine why you think he can be punished. People may believe as they will
and teach their children as they will.

[1ozzy]

So the child should be punished, not the radical parent?

[naomi24]

Only in an Orwellian world is thought a crime.

[1ozzy]

So you will be safe Naomi

[naomi24]

Pardon?

[Khandro]

1ozzy; //The stupid innocence of youth should haunt you throughout life?//

Yes it does, Buddhists call it karma (kamma in Pali) & there's no escaping it, we all have it, she too.

Christians (a bit thin on the ground on AB !) might quote the good book; Romans 12:19

[Peter Pedant]

I think claiming about trafficking ( which gives victims more rights) is being tried on and will be found to be a flash in the pan

as in "that option was OK for a year or two but is now busted"

Her lawyer ( legal aid) was outside court because he had been excluded from the NIAC court - which has the powers to hear evidence in camera

The plaintiffs lawyers (terrorist sympathisers all of them) are then substituted for a good loyal anglo who knows a bit of law and speaks for the plaintiff as best he can since they have never met

not that satisfactory as a system but as usual the players in the game did this to themselves ( lawyers used as message mules).

and the secrets are then pleaded - in this case , she still has terrorist sympathies, wont disclose what she did, and is not a true Brit ( altho she SAYS she IS) - - - ha!

she also is alleged to have sewn suicide bombers into their shirts ( they get a change of heart just before, but go bang anyway)

Obama was gonna let the wholla Guantanamo out on the first day of his presidency, and the CIA showed him ISIS training videos on that very first day:
Lecturer " I was detained at Guantanamo for five years and persuaded them I was a gardener and not a bomb maker. This is how you do it....."

and obama said oops OK let me think about that

[Peter Pedant]

She’s not a one off by any means. She should be kept out - but she won’t be. The useful idiots will see to that.

thank god Naomi is wrong at least half the time
I think she will fail - I think she doesnt want to tell people ( the spooks ) what she really did....( coz it was naughty)