Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Oh No, Gag Her Forever Please.
Haven't we heard enough from this self-confessed liar. Surely the last thing we want is for the Andrew Saga to plunge 2023 News back into the cesspit which 2022 has become.
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AH, //Interesting that those who positively contort themselves to assure us of the 'innocence' of the dreadful Prince, seem less interested in confirming that Ms Guiffre has committed no crime either. //
I can't see anyone contorting themselves - you seem to be imagining that - but did anyone accuse her of a crime? If they did I must have missed it.
I can't see anyone contorting themselves - you seem to be imagining that - but did anyone accuse her of a crime? If they did I must have missed it.
She admitted that she lied in Court (in another case). Isn't that a crime?
However unsavoury Andrew may appear to be, the only "evidence" against him is this girl's testimony.
My OP was suggesting that the gag should remain, otherwise she is highly likely to court further publicity with regurgitated allegations, she being unable to resist the rich rewards for so doing being dangled by the Gutter Press. The latter know that the Palace are unlikely to prosecute for slander/libel.
Sadly, a significant number of the general public lap up "beating a man when he's down", therefore doing so becomes very profitable for the Mucky Media.
However unsavoury Andrew may appear to be, the only "evidence" against him is this girl's testimony.
My OP was suggesting that the gag should remain, otherwise she is highly likely to court further publicity with regurgitated allegations, she being unable to resist the rich rewards for so doing being dangled by the Gutter Press. The latter know that the Palace are unlikely to prosecute for slander/libel.
Sadly, a significant number of the general public lap up "beating a man when he's down", therefore doing so becomes very profitable for the Mucky Media.
Canary - // Sadly, a significant number of the general public lap up "beating a man when he's down", //
That's an interesting assessment or a man who is generally acknowledged by people who have had much to do with him, of being arrogant, boorish, pompous, stupid, and exercising galaxy-sized bad judgement on more than one occasion.
If he is 'down', it's because he put himself there, and has no-one else to blame for that.
That's an interesting assessment or a man who is generally acknowledged by people who have had much to do with him, of being arrogant, boorish, pompous, stupid, and exercising galaxy-sized bad judgement on more than one occasion.
If he is 'down', it's because he put himself there, and has no-one else to blame for that.
Spungle I don't know this for sure, but I read that if it went to court then Meghan Markle could be called as a witness as it is thought she was providing a similar service on yachts, and so the money was paid to stop her being called and bringing more disgrace on the family.
Let me repeat, it is only what I read.
Let me repeat, it is only what I read.
RH ///The only thing PA is guilty of is poor judgment///
This reads like the words of an apologist.
Go back 12 years to 2010, PA was to stay at Epstein's New York mansion. This happened shortly after Epstein was freed, having been gaoled for child sex offences in 2008.
As for lack of judgement, one could be forgiven for thinking PA was complicit.
This reads like the words of an apologist.
Go back 12 years to 2010, PA was to stay at Epstein's New York mansion. This happened shortly after Epstein was freed, having been gaoled for child sex offences in 2008.
As for lack of judgement, one could be forgiven for thinking PA was complicit.
Redhelen - // She went willingly with Epstein to be his masseuse when she had no experience being paid far more than people with years of experience.
The only thing PA is guilty of is poor judgment //
If we're offering the notion of 'poor judgement' as an excuse, the surely we can extend that to Ms Guiffre as well.
She was younger, and far less experienced in the ways of the world than Prince Andrew, so if 'poor judgement' excuses his part in this sorry situation, does that also apply to her as well?
I think it must.
The only thing PA is guilty of is poor judgment //
If we're offering the notion of 'poor judgement' as an excuse, the surely we can extend that to Ms Guiffre as well.
She was younger, and far less experienced in the ways of the world than Prince Andrew, so if 'poor judgement' excuses his part in this sorry situation, does that also apply to her as well?
I think it must.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.