Where Can I Find The Best Street Food In...
Food & Drink0 min ago
Oh No, Gag Her Forever Please.
Haven't we heard enough from this self-confessed liar. Surely the last thing we want is for the Andrew Saga to plunge 2023 News back into the cesspit which 2022 has become.
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Why should Ms Guiffre be 'gagged'?
She lives in a country that embraces the concept of free speech, and she should not be denied that freedom because exercising her right may embarrass a boorish idiot who is entirely the architect of his own misfortune.
As the link points out, her settlement may include a non-disclosure agreement about his behaviour.
And if not, the interest will be far less damaging now he is a 'non person' in royal terms, a situation for which he is entirely to blame.
She lives in a country that embraces the concept of free speech, and she should not be denied that freedom because exercising her right may embarrass a boorish idiot who is entirely the architect of his own misfortune.
As the link points out, her settlement may include a non-disclosure agreement about his behaviour.
And if not, the interest will be far less damaging now he is a 'non person' in royal terms, a situation for which he is entirely to blame.
She made shed loads of money though.
I found it interesting that for her it wasn’t about the money, and all she wanted was her day in court, but when millions were on the table, her wish for her day in court vanished.
I think Andrew is a scumbag, but I also think Guiffre was only ever interested in the money.
I found it interesting that for her it wasn’t about the money, and all she wanted was her day in court, but when millions were on the table, her wish for her day in court vanished.
I think Andrew is a scumbag, but I also think Guiffre was only ever interested in the money.
I remain mystified as to the volume and venom of hostility this woman attracts.
She did not sue for £12 million, it was offered to her as a settlement, and given the option of stopping the ongoing nightmare of having her ordeal at the hands of Epstein dragged on and on in public, it's unsurprising that she took it.
The gagging order is not something she fought, or objected to, and if its termination gives her the right to tell her story wherever she pleases, then again, that is her right.
I can't understand why everyone is so hostile towards her, when she has been the victim in a grooming set-up, and has chosen to speak out and defend herself and attempt to bring one of her abusers to justice.
And anyone who thinks she continued voluntarily knows next to nothing about how grooming and abuse set-ups work, and should look into some detail about those situations before assuming that she was automatically a willing participant.
She did not sue for £12 million, it was offered to her as a settlement, and given the option of stopping the ongoing nightmare of having her ordeal at the hands of Epstein dragged on and on in public, it's unsurprising that she took it.
The gagging order is not something she fought, or objected to, and if its termination gives her the right to tell her story wherever she pleases, then again, that is her right.
I can't understand why everyone is so hostile towards her, when she has been the victim in a grooming set-up, and has chosen to speak out and defend herself and attempt to bring one of her abusers to justice.
And anyone who thinks she continued voluntarily knows next to nothing about how grooming and abuse set-ups work, and should look into some detail about those situations before assuming that she was automatically a willing participant.
I said at 11.36 that Ms Guiffre did not sue for money, she wanted her day in court.
The settlement was offered by the Palace to keep the case out of the public eye and away from the Jubilee celebrations.
I for one for one do not blame her for taking the money - but that does not automatically mean that a financial settlement was the motivation for her court case, as a number of people on here seem keen to conclude.
The settlement was offered by the Palace to keep the case out of the public eye and away from the Jubilee celebrations.
I for one for one do not blame her for taking the money - but that does not automatically mean that a financial settlement was the motivation for her court case, as a number of people on here seem keen to conclude.
sandyRoe, I read that his daughter, Beatrice, I think, advised him to do the television interview.
Latest Posts
How it Works6 mins ago
Labour Scraps Doctors' Apprenticeships
News12 mins ago
Good Morning Boxing Day Birds!
ChatterBank20 mins ago
How it Works39 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.