// CTG, interesting article... //
Glad you thought so.
I don't particularly have a concrete opinion on the strikes, or the pay offer. It is, perhaps, useful though to avoid trotting out the "increasing salaries will only make the problem worse" line all the time. Especially, I'd say, for jobs like teaching, or nursing, or other medical jobs -- when, both because of the circumstances of the last decade or so *and* because such jobs ought to be highly-valued anyhow, it seems slightly callous to dismiss requests for pay rises.
I suspect the union would end up settling for a below-inflation rise anyway --7%, perhaps, along with the cash offer on the table -- just as long as it's one that isn't so far below. An above-inflation pay rise, in the present circumstances at least, is probably too much of an ask. But, to return to the question you posed at the start, I don't think that rejecting this offer throws the "[pretence] that this is about pay" out of the window. There's still room for the Government to negotiate. It's true that, as far as I can tell, the NEU is asking for an "above-inflation" pay rise (
https://neu.org.uk/pay/pay-campaign ), but that means that there's still a huge gap between the Government's position, and the NEU's: 4.3%(+£1000 one-off) as opposed to something north of 10%.