Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Migrant Living Accomidation Overload
this is a question no has asked, what happens when all hotels are full, all ex military bases are full, and more illegals keep arriving, whats going to happen then, or will the powers that be say enough is enough frig legal obligations, and just deport and stop them in the channel with a no your not landing and we will not help, what a stand off, inevitable?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.gromit, you htink labour can turn it around with illegals, crikey they welcome them for more votes, frig the natives ehh, what we need is a radical government thats hard right wit the use of the military to set things right...i can imagine in the future the natives getting restless
with revolt and all that it brings...enough.
with revolt and all that it brings...enough.
//...meanwhile my company is nearly going bust,plenty of orders for our products,not enough workers to process the orders.Meanwhile down the road in a luxury hotel...//
You keep on mentioning this. Are you suggesting that the cure for your company's woes is to import cheap, foreign labour because the work-shy in Aberdeen won't get out of bed? You should have a little think about that. I don't know what the housing situation is in Aberdeen, or what state the vital services (healthcare, education, etc.) are in. But if they are anything like much of the rest of the UK, the last thing it needs is an influx of foreigners, most of whom have arrived illegally, to fill your vacancies. Where do they live (assuming the taxpayer is not to fund hotel rooms for them in perpetuity)?
The answer is for your employer to make the jobs more attractive for those already here and for the government to stop paying people to sit at home when work is available. The idea of Brexit was to reduce the country's dependency on cheap foreign labour. If all that business leaders can think of to keep their businesses afloat is to employ cheap foreign labour, they don't deserve to thrive.
You keep on mentioning this. Are you suggesting that the cure for your company's woes is to import cheap, foreign labour because the work-shy in Aberdeen won't get out of bed? You should have a little think about that. I don't know what the housing situation is in Aberdeen, or what state the vital services (healthcare, education, etc.) are in. But if they are anything like much of the rest of the UK, the last thing it needs is an influx of foreigners, most of whom have arrived illegally, to fill your vacancies. Where do they live (assuming the taxpayer is not to fund hotel rooms for them in perpetuity)?
The answer is for your employer to make the jobs more attractive for those already here and for the government to stop paying people to sit at home when work is available. The idea of Brexit was to reduce the country's dependency on cheap foreign labour. If all that business leaders can think of to keep their businesses afloat is to employ cheap foreign labour, they don't deserve to thrive.
Bobbi
The left wing lawyers can hardly bleat about deporting these undesirables to a British Dependency instead of Rwanda. The inhabitants are protected by a standing garrison of British military in Port Stanley and outlying farmsteads. The weather is pretty bleak, cold and inhospitable. Plenty of empty land to build Internment camps for them. What's not to like about sending them there? If they want freedom and protection from war and persecution then they will get it there but they should learn they can't pick and choose where to find it. France and the rest of Europe was a good alternative but they shunned it ,Bloody Tough.
The left wing lawyers can hardly bleat about deporting these undesirables to a British Dependency instead of Rwanda. The inhabitants are protected by a standing garrison of British military in Port Stanley and outlying farmsteads. The weather is pretty bleak, cold and inhospitable. Plenty of empty land to build Internment camps for them. What's not to like about sending them there? If they want freedom and protection from war and persecution then they will get it there but they should learn they can't pick and choose where to find it. France and the rest of Europe was a good alternative but they shunned it ,Bloody Tough.
//Why do you hate us British and British businesses so much NJ?//
I most certainly do not. I simply dislike the business models that are promoted which seem to insist that, although there are plenty of people without work in the UK, we must ship in vast numbers of people, sometimes of dubious backgrounds, in order to ostensibly do the jobs that those already here will not do. They then proceed to pay low wages which means the taxpayer has to support that by providing benefits to those who are working (thanks to Gordon Brown's "working tax credits").
It is the economics of the madhouse to have to provide accommodation and public services for migrant labour when both those facilities are utterly stretched to the limit. It's an easy option for businesses and it needs to be stopped, not encouraged.
I most certainly do not. I simply dislike the business models that are promoted which seem to insist that, although there are plenty of people without work in the UK, we must ship in vast numbers of people, sometimes of dubious backgrounds, in order to ostensibly do the jobs that those already here will not do. They then proceed to pay low wages which means the taxpayer has to support that by providing benefits to those who are working (thanks to Gordon Brown's "working tax credits").
It is the economics of the madhouse to have to provide accommodation and public services for migrant labour when both those facilities are utterly stretched to the limit. It's an easy option for businesses and it needs to be stopped, not encouraged.
//Why the Falklands? It’s a British dependency//
Having visited the Falkland Islands before they became well known I can tell you why not. The Falklands have a population of under 4,000, more than 60% of whom live in Port Stanley. They have the infrastructure and services to accommodate just that number. To ship large numbers of foreign migrants into such a small community would destabilise it very easily and the people of the Falklands would not be able to cope.
There is no reason why the Falkland Islanders should be subject to such an intrusion and the UK needs to move away from devising plans for coping with people who arrive here by unconventional means and instead move towards stopping them arriving in the first place.
Having visited the Falkland Islands before they became well known I can tell you why not. The Falklands have a population of under 4,000, more than 60% of whom live in Port Stanley. They have the infrastructure and services to accommodate just that number. To ship large numbers of foreign migrants into such a small community would destabilise it very easily and the people of the Falklands would not be able to cope.
There is no reason why the Falkland Islanders should be subject to such an intrusion and the UK needs to move away from devising plans for coping with people who arrive here by unconventional means and instead move towards stopping them arriving in the first place.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.