Of the 40 page dossier the bank compiled on Mr Farage, it is said that “Ultimately it concludes the former Brexit Party leader's views are ‘at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation’.”
I wonder if the bank’s interim chief Executive is now added to the list of all those who are wrong are still wrong (whilst one esteemed member on here and a woman on YouTube are still right).
Well Zacs, at one time we had the right to be paid for our labour in cash. Now-a-days that right has been stripped from us, so you are obliged to have it put into an account, probably so the government can monitor what you're up to, consequently you are obliged to have an account.
The trouble is, Hymie, that the fools didn't vote for Brexit. They were the ones in the other camp. So NF has no one to apologise to, even if someone can find anything for him to apologise for.
I wonder if the bank’s interim chief...yakety yak blah blah blah .....man on YouTube are still right.
No they dont - not a word of it
it is clear they love Rosie - the trashed chief exec
and if they had their day over, they wdnt fire her
but give her a pay rise
god knows
do they kknow that Coutts reputation is down the trash can?
nope - the thought has not crossed any of their minds
do you remember "I love onions la-la-la!"
try it
go on
" I love Boris la-la-la"
and see the look of consternation on their faces
( with one of the usual suspects whispering: I dont think he does really you know)
What abuse do you suggest you are getting over Farage in this thread?
I raised it, largely directed towards you and the woman on YouTube, when it was announced last night that the interim boss at Coutts (the previous incumbent having resigned over the matter) had offered to reinstate Mr Farage's accounts.
Over the last week or so you have continually maintained that you (and the woman on YouTube) were correct in saying that Coutts had cancelled Mr Farage's account solely on the basis that he was "too poor". The pair of you seemed almost alone in that belief. Even Gina Miller - of whom I thought you would have been somewhat fond but who you have now added to your list of "idiots" - sided with Mr Farage.
So I thought it was worth asking - in view of yesterday's announcement - whether you were ready to add the interim boss of Coutts to the list of people who (you say) were wrong to accept that the closure decision was purely based on Mr Farage's finances.
Unfortunately instead of answering that you decided to divert the thread away from the issue and towards Brexit - which my question had nothing to do with.
I fail to see where any "abuse" comes in. As the saying goes: "If you can't take the heat....."
‘Now-a-days that right has been stripped from us, so you are obliged to have it put into an account, probably so the government can monitor what you're up to’
Khandro ‘ No I was wrong in writing 'Invention', he most likely said, 'it came from the EU' I wasn't quoting him verbatim, it was a couple of weeks ago’
Most likely…..so you’re not at all sure? What a strange thing to do, trying to bolster an argument based on a vague recollection.
Zacs-Master; This thread is about, quote: 'Nigel Farage Vs Coutts.', not me & syntax. PEPs entered the UK banking system, which disadvantaged Nigel Farage, via the European Union
Man up for God's sake, you're like an old woman.
Khandro, it’s funny how blatant errors morph into being ‘syntax’ when a person is wrong. Do you fascist types go to some special arrogance training camp where your powers of reasoning are stripped out and replaced by sneering insults?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.