ChatterBank1 min ago
Trump’s Latest Indictment Charges Includes Racketeering
If found guilty there is a mandatory minimum 5 year jail term within Georgia for racketeering.
18 others have been charged within the indictment, including Rudy Giuliani.
Interesting times ahead.
18 others have been charged within the indictment, including Rudy Giuliani.
Interesting times ahead.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.YMB
"He was stating fact. I would be willing to bet similar is said in any election anywhere that is challenged."
What 'fact'? Nothing he said was factual. It was all disproven.
Other elections have been challenged - but can you think of any which have resulted in the incumbent trying to persuade a government official to 'find' votes?
"He was stating fact. I would be willing to bet similar is said in any election anywhere that is challenged."
What 'fact'? Nothing he said was factual. It was all disproven.
Other elections have been challenged - but can you think of any which have resulted in the incumbent trying to persuade a government official to 'find' votes?
The transcript and audio of the January 2nd 'phone call can be read and heard here,
https:/ /archiv e.ph/BM C7Q
https:/
TCL
I posted a link to a video of it.
Resulted in a bit of this I’m afraid:
https:/ /tinyur l.com/3 7xu849u
I posted a link to a video of it.
Resulted in a bit of this I’m afraid:
https:/
anneasquith
Spot on.
I personally thought the Stormy Daniels pay-off and the White House documents thing were very “meh”, but how anyone can listen to that phone call and not conclude that the man tried to overturn a democratic election is beyond me.
It’s what you expect from a tinpot dictator not the US President.
From Obama to Trump.
Sheesh.
Spot on.
I personally thought the Stormy Daniels pay-off and the White House documents thing were very “meh”, but how anyone can listen to that phone call and not conclude that the man tried to overturn a democratic election is beyond me.
It’s what you expect from a tinpot dictator not the US President.
From Obama to Trump.
Sheesh.
// Look, I have stated on here I dont want Trump around in 2024 but that doesnt mean he is guilty of everything you want him to be. Try looking at it impartially.//
I'm not altogether convinced that anyone here can really claim to look at this "impartially" -- and certainly it's unreasonable to say that the "impartial" line is that this is all a witch hunt, which is just parrotting Trump's own propaganda.
I'm not altogether convinced that anyone here can really claim to look at this "impartially" -- and certainly it's unreasonable to say that the "impartial" line is that this is all a witch hunt, which is just parrotting Trump's own propaganda.
//I'm not altogether convinced that anyone here can really claim to look at this "impartially" //
Well I can't really argue with that.
But honestly listen with an open mind and then tell me that video is evidence of wrong doing. I had expected him to be ranting but he wasn't, seem very calm (for him).
And there has been a witch hunt. No other President has ever been investigated so much (and so far nothing to stick). That has all the hallmarks of a witch hunt to me.
Well I can't really argue with that.
But honestly listen with an open mind and then tell me that video is evidence of wrong doing. I had expected him to be ranting but he wasn't, seem very calm (for him).
And there has been a witch hunt. No other President has ever been investigated so much (and so far nothing to stick). That has all the hallmarks of a witch hunt to me.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.