ChatterBank4 mins ago
I See The Israelis Have Resumed Exercising Their "Right To Self Defense".
Reports say 30 Palestinians have been killed this morning.
When will western governments come to see that they're watching acts of bloody revenge that wouldn't be out of place in one of the gorier sections of the Old Testament?
Answers
The complete annihilation of Hamas is impossible, given the difficulty in killing an idea.The only real answer is to civilise negotiations on both sides taking their respective populations with them, this though is only slightly less difficult than killing the idea.
14:55 Fri 01st Dec 2023
> Ellipsis, no point getting stroppy with me. You said it.
I am not stroppy, I'm actually laughing at your impudent manipulation of what I did actually say. Every time I say "kill and maim fewer innocent people" you change it to "kill fewer people", which completely changes the meaning, as you know. There is an important difference between "people" and "innocent people", and I showed that some people that have been killed are indisputably innocent.
From human rights watch
https:/
"On November 9, Israeli airstrikes hit Al-Nasr Medical Center in Gaza City, cutting off the neonatal intensive care unit’s oxygen supply. The attack forced staff to evacuate the next day, leaving babies that could not be transported alone in intensive care, according to Doctors Without Borders. On November 28 during the ceasefire, doctors were able to return and found five babies dead."
naomi calls it "virtue signalling" to object to this... an indication of just how empty and nasty that phrase is. "virtue signalling" to say that israel should not bomb hospitals or kill children. apparently it's all worth it in order to wage war on islam. what an evil worldview.
> virtue signalling: the public expression of opinions or sentiments intended to demonstrate one's good character or social conscience or the moral correctness of one's position on a particular issue.
Virtue signalling cuts both ways, you know ... saying that somebody is virtue signalling is, in itself, an example of virtue signalling, even if you were wrong about the original virtue signalling in the first place!
> With Hamas using the civilian population to its own ends your suggestion is nothing more than unworkable idealism. It's not realistic.
Your answer is the equivalent of Pavlovian dog salivating at the master's bell. You are saying that Israel has no choice, it can only do what it is doing, killing thousands of innocent people. But of course it does have choices ...
Hamas has stopped the ceasefire just like on the 7th Oct
https:/
if it were me and i had the ultimate decision, id remove palestinians from gaza and make it part of isreal and it would prosper and be transformed modernised etc, palestinians can me moved to the westbank and let the arabs bankroll them to rebuild, have there own state, with a nice big wall between both countries, let's see who prospers without arab money, cause arabs don't really care, different tribes see, ie sunni shia hate divide...although they pay lip service..brothers and all that, a palestinian state needs economics exports besides more palestinians, tourism perhaps? olives erm, this is not a dig either, but a realistic proposal.
Untitled, objecting to babies being killed isn't virtue signalling. These hand-wringing objections to Israel defending itself and faux claims of genocide and ethnic cleansing is virtue signalling - and if anyone has an evil world view it's Hamas and those who think like them. They're the people you should be attacking. By their actions they are killing their own - babies and all!!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.