Any Housing Schemes For Non First Time...
Home & Garden0 min ago
//Earlier this week, Willoughby, a trans woman and broadcaster, reported the Harry Potter author to the police for calling her a man. In an interview with Byline TV, Willoughby, 58, said of the posts: “JK Rowling has definitely committed a crime.//
J K Rowling said //“No law compels anyone to pretend to believe that India is a woman.
“Aware as I am that it’s an offence to lie to law enforcement, I’ll simply have to explain to the police that, in my view, India is a classic example of the male narcissist who lives in a state of perpetual rage that he can’t compel women to take him at his own valuation.”//
Yet again J K Rowling champions women. Good for her. Common sense reigns.
What came first was the assertion by TransRightsActivists that Transwomen were women and should therefore be accorded every right hard-won by women; with full and unfettered access to women-only spaces, inclusion in women-only sports and accorded the langauge and descriptors used by and for women.
JKR was one of many (but by no means the first, most vocal or most radical) to push back against this pernicious ideology. However, the TRAs made her their whipping-person and have focused all their impotent anger, vitriol, spite and ill-will in her direction.
She deals with it magnificently and the fact that they are unable to get her 'de-platformed' or 'cancelled' drives them potty.
You might think that she is being deliberately provocative with her use of language in Mushroom's post at 17.32; but that is precisely the sort of word-salad nonsense we would be heading for should the TRAs get their way.
If you don't believe me, look at the recent Irish Referendum.
JkRowling has suffered sexual and domestic abuse in the past. That's probably why she supports'safe-spaces for women'. She said that she felt she had to say something about trans people when Scotland announced that they were considering allowing trans people to put the gender they wanted to be on their birth certificates. JKR didn't think this was right and said that they should not allow this unless the person had undergone medical counselling and had a transitional operation.
Very well said, Jackthehat. Have a best answer. With the newspeak even in medical terminology that we're all expected to meekly accept and embrace the very word 'women' is being systematically erased from our language. If 'trans women' really were women they could justifiably dispose of the 'trans'. As it is they can't - because they're not.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.