Does Anyone Remember Hans + Lotte Hass..
ChatterBank3 mins ago
https:/
Sir Beer wants to lower it to 16, of course he does, it's well known that youngsters are left wing until they acquire assets. Personally I'd raise it to 21.
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.labour want it lowered because they think they'll get more votes and the tories don't want it lowered because they also think labour would gain votes... that's really all there is to it lol. it is not an issue of any substance.
the age must be set somewhere and i don't think it really matters all that much
if you really truly want to restrict voting to people with maturity or intelligence or whatever then age and resources are not reliable indicators of these things... you could in theory have an "adulthood exam" that you can sit at any age and have to retake every 5-10 years and pass in order to vote... that way child prodigies would not suffer disenfranchisement haha
but it is going to be age based forever and 18 or 16 really makes no difference as far as i can see
Here's a couple of slightly more sensible ideas:
Is your main residence outside of the UK? If it is and it's not because of your occupation, you lose your right to vote.
Were you born outside the UK to non-UK citizens? Yes? No vote for you either.
Voting history: if you haven't exercised your right to vote repeatedly in the past, what's the point of you being given a vote now?
I have to disagree with them being sensible.
If living abroad but still a UK citizen you may still want the best for your country, and may wish to see standards kept high, possibly in anticipation of a return at some point.
If born outside the UK then there may be some argument for restrictions, but if you have genuinely adopted this country are you not entitled to have a say ? A blanket ban seems inappropriate wrt basic citizen rights.
Since the right not to have to vote for a candidate you don't approve of is equally important as the right to select one you do, the idea of removing the right to vote is a complete non-starter. In fact a public information campaign to inform the public that they don't need to feel obliged to vote for garbage manifestos would probably be a good thing.
"Were you born outside the UK to non-UK citizens? Yes? No vote for you either."
there are millions of people who are born abroad and become British citizens... for many it is long and difficult and expensive process. frankly such people do a lot more to earn their citizenship than the average born brit does. why should they be disenfranchised?
outside of infancy/basic education there is no correlation at all between age and wisdom. many old people are extremely bigoted and many go through life thinking they were taught everything they needed at 18 and refuse to learn anything else. others especially of the boomer generation are simply too self-absorbed and emotionally fragile to develop. many more of course are more normal and do learn from experience and develop empathy as they get older.
while there are young people who are stupid or overconfident or lazy it is also not difficult to find examples of young people who work extremely hard to improve themselves, to learn and to think.
past a certain point a person's age tells you absolutely nothing about their intellectual ability, their maturity or their compassion.
so... if we absolutely must decide who can vote based on age then it really does not matter what age it is set at. it is arbitrary.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.