News1 min ago
Labour Have Been No Time In Office And Yet...
... they've already overseen a settlement of the rail dispute.
This must auger well for their time in office.
Agree?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Any idiot could have settled on the terms they have.
The main cause of the dispute was never money. It was the requirement to change working practices which the unions have been resisting since the days of steam. It was that which was causing the dispute.
The government has caved in and provided a settlement with no changes in working practices. Among the results of this is, for example, that train drivers work on Sundays as a favour. The rotas rely on volunteers to drive the trains on Sundays and if there are no volunteers there are no trains.
The previous government was holding out to see that ludicrous situation ended. As I said, any idiot could have settled on the basis this government has.
What you mean is they have caved in to the unions with an over the top pay demand.
The average train driver salary in the UK is £48,500 per year. Train drivers can expect to begin with an average starting salary of £30,000, with the highest salaries often exceeding £65,000.
How does that compare with your salary ? and I suggest that driving a train is not much more difficult that driving a car.
"The fact that Labour have got the trains running on time again will be a boon to many thousands, perhaps millions, of travellers."
Unless you want to travel on Sundays.
"Oh the rail unions will be back for more very soon, just watch."
Inded they will, hoppy. And they won't be alone. The public service unions will make hay over the next five years as the government happily doles out lorry loads of other people's money.
Driving a train is a lot harder than people imagine. The first requirement is an extremely good memory. He or she has to know the number of every signal along his route and they have to know exactly where they are. A driver must, on a foggy night know exactly, even though they cant see a thing, where to start slowing for the next station. That's not an easy feat with trains travelling at 125 mph. What they have to know is as complicated as the "Knowledge" is for London taxi drivers.
// Why are train drivers even needed with today's technology. //
today's technology cannot cope with a multi-use railway in the manner you suggest. it's fine for a closed or single use system, where all the trains are identical, travel at the same speed and all stop at all stations. the UK railway isn't like that.
on many lines there are stopping trains with different stopping patterns, as well as non-stopping trains. on the principal main lines there are express trains as well as "enhanced" express trains such as tilting Pendolinos and voyagers that can take sharper curves at higher speeds. Also there are freight trains which, dependent on their make up, can (or are limited to) a variety of different speeds.
the signalling system currently being installed (European Train Control System or ETCS) cannot automatically control such a variety of trains on one system. it can, to a limited extent, control braking on approach to junctions or stations, but the algorithms are complicated by the different speeds and weights of trains, so compromises are needed. all freight trains are braked at the same rate, which means lighter ones can be slowed unnecessarily, which delays following services.
no, today's technology cannot eliminate train drivers.
wolf63; //My dad was a train driver. My mum once told him that... Driving a train must be easy, a dead man could stop one.//
I understand what your mum was saying. For the benefit of anyone that doesn't, she was referring to the 'Dead Man's Brake' on which the driver keeps his foot all the time, If as in the case of a heart-attack the pedal is released the brake is applied.
vulcan; //A driver must, on a foggy night know exactly, even though they cant see a thing, where to start slowing for the next station. //
I think you are going back a century; technology has moved moved on somewhat since then. 🙂
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.