ChatterBank3 mins ago
David Lammy Really Is An Embarrassment
Answers
It is because despite his reference to imperialism he opted to compare the Russian invasion with the taking of black slaves, something he personally has no experience of anyway, and shoehorning his preferred subject into the speech instead of sticking to the point.
As far as we know, no Ukrainians have been taken ss slaves.
It was a ludicrious and embarrassing thing to do, particularly at such a meeting. IMO most likely all there squirmed in their seats a bit.
ss is an unfortunate slip - considering ( look out Abers, some O level history coming up!) their role 1941-45. - Collaboration, manning the concentration camps, fighting for the Germans
as my Father said to his captors in the East - " You were welcomed as liberators, but as a result of the cruelty you showed, you are now being invaded!" - and the Guard said ( German) yes mistakes were made.....
er my point is ( beyond a lot of Abers) is that the Ukrainians did not enjoy their Russian overlords to the extent of joining up - the German Army !
Germans ( now) NOT saying Yippee lets do it all again
This of course was the man who, in 2009 (whilst he was Minister of State for Higher Education) appeared on "Mastermind".
Among the "unfortunate" incorrect answers he gave was that Henry VII followed Henry VIII to the throne and that Marie and Pierre Antoinette were awarded the Nobel Prize. He also believed that Red Leicester was the cheese that should accompany after dinner Port (though he might be forgiven that, having been brought up in Tottenham).
Most worrying of all (in view of his current role) was that he also believed the "Rose Revolution" took place in Yugoslavia. This was a non-violent political upheaval in Georgia (not the one in Alabama) which led to the resignation of President Eduard Shevardnadze, marking the end of the Soviet era leadership in that country. This had taken place just six years earlier, when Mr Lammy was serving in the Blair government as Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs.
I recall at the time of the 1983 General Election remarking, tongue-in-cheek, that if Labour (under Michael Foot) was to win, we could look forward to Dennis Skinner being appointed Foreign Secretary.
Little did I know that 41 years later a similar embarassment would be visited on the nation.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.