Protests Erupt In Syria Over Christmas...
News4 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by netibiza. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.MPs voted on Tuesday by a margin of 200 votes to impose a ban on smoking in all enclosed public spaces, despite months of wrangling over the issue e.g. it doesn't matter if someone works there or not - thus some bus shelters will be non-smoking etc http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4714992.stm
though as you can see from the linked article prisons are execpt for the reasons already discussed
There would be all sorts of riots if smoking in prisons were banned, very good question though. On paper it should be banned. Glad her magesty's guests are keeping a liberty that I'm not. Another needle in the wound, already wound up by the Houses of Parliment bar!!! (thanks for pointing that out laurence2 ;o)
Do you think if I get a note from my doctor saying I'm addicted, then I can smoke anywhere I want - was working fairly well for Pete Docherty.
I've just popped downstairs to look at the paper & it actually reads:
Stubbed Out - MP's vote for smoking ban in pubs & clubs from 2007 (but not in the Commons bar).
Almost the only places where the law will not apply, will be the bars serving MP's & Peers, it emerged last night. The Palace of Westminster is classed as a Royal palace, and therefore exempt!
So although it doesn't actually read 'The Houses of Parliament Bar' as was mentioned earlier by fellow AB'ers & myself - it all boils down to the same thing - one rule for one & one for another!
well according to the Bill available here , if you would like to look under exemptions then there is nothing about the Commons Bar - just about places where a person has a home / temporary home.
If the MPs voted to allow members private clubs to remain smoking areas, then the commons bar may have also been exempt (it being private not public) but since they voted for a total ban that (to me) would imply that the commons bar is also affected.
That said, I am sure that the Daily Mail would never print something that was so blatantly untrue ;-)