The Perils Of Privatisation - Part X
News2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by asciwhite. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Dictionary Definition of vigilante
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&lr=&oi=defmore&defl=en&q=define:Vigilante
An awful crime and a horrendous ordeal for the child involved! Fortunately though, quite rare compared to the numbers of chidren raped day and daily by their own fathers/grandfathers/brothers/uncles/ and so called carers!!
Hopefully the rapist will be caught and punished and the child and her family will be given all the help they need to rebuild their lives!
I have read the debate here with interest, and I have to second noxlumos's observations on this one.
I have said many times on this site, and I will say it again - laws are what make us civilised.
The notion of an individual or group of people taking it upon themselves to assume the righteous anger of society as a whole, and act out a revenge seen as appropriate is a worrying thought. Who 'elects' these people as our moral guardians and keepers of our responses? Who decides who does what to whom? No-one. This notion is entirely self-appointed by individuals who think that their reactions of loathing and disgust are more pertinent than anyone else's, so they are given carte blanche to exorcise this emotion by acts of violence and murder.
As a parent of three daughters, my reaction is to cut this man into one-inch cubes with a rusty tin lid, but we live in a civilised society, and our laws are there to act in these instances. Laws are based on concensus and calm intelligent thought not a sliding scale of "I can be just as brutal and bloodthirsty as you matey ...." train of thought.
Hope that the law will act appropriately, and that this poor child can pick up her life surrounded by people who live ordered lives governed by laws, not behind barricaded doors because someone out there in the 'vigilante' code of justicce will be looking to cut her arms and legs off, because she 'asked for it'.
Vigilante law only works for those who promote themselves to carry it out - but who decides who they are, or what they do?
Beware your thoughts asciwhite - they may offend other 'like-minded' people who think you are in thew wrong - and who will protect you then?
I am aware of the concept of 'debate', and 'two sides', and 'law' - my thinking on these issues is clear, which is why I posted as I did, but I am not the one advocating a punishment meted out by any individual based purely on the strength of his reaction to the issue - with proportionate violence and pain to be meted out as he sees fit.
You may need to point out the rationale of fairness and debate, but I suggest you commence with others who replied before I did - they appear more in need of your advice than I.