Developing Fast': Britain Facing...
News3 mins ago
A largely ignored story was debated on Jeremy Vine's show today -
an extreme anti-abortionist in his 70's forwarded temprary address details to his local hospital regarding his proplsed hip replacement, and he enclosed graphic photos of discarded foetuses wich caused severe upset on receipt, and caused the Chief Exec. to cry. This gentleman has been to prison 19 times for his actions in drawing attention to abortion and 'sodomite' pornography. After issuing a number of warnings about his conduct, the hospital have now refused to allow this gentleman to receive his hip replacement.
Right or wrong? And why?
No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The staff at hospitals deserve the right not to be abused. If thats in letter form, picture form, words etc it doesnt matter. They have the right to work in a safe enviroment.
This idiot whatever his views is not at risk. He was warned, he chose to ignore these warnings...so he has noone to blame but himself
As has been mentioned above, his unpleasant behaviour is the reason he will not receive treatment and rightly so.
If I was to curse at my GP or dentist, I'm certain they would expect me to go elsewhere for treatment. Equally, if someone was abusive to any members of my staff, I would refuse to serve them.
The key thing is that he's not being refused treatment because he holds certain views - if that was the case it would be wrong.
It's because he behaves abusively towards the staff, and they have a right to be protected from that abuse. I don't care how much National Insurance he's paid over the years, you still have to follow certain rules if you expect to be let in to the hospital.
Hmmmmmm, so difficult a decision to make by the hospital i would think.
The chief exec cried? why? that is the envoiroment you work in, and some results are not pleasant and they (the workforce) are aware of it. Does that mean the chief exec disagrees with hospital policy? on regards to abortion?
I'm not with the whole argument here of why he was refused a hip replacement. It will not be on his criminal record or his beliefs. If it is, why? but.... because of his abusive nature, (even though his beliefs are possibly founded ie: abortion) then no, he doesnt deserve the treatment.
what i dont understand is.... what has abortion to do with his hip replacement? or is it that he doesnt believe money from the NHS should be spent on abortion?
Sodomy? now he is possibly arguing on the God front. Nothing to do with anything NHS.
I imagine this decision was not taken lightly.
p.s I thought George Best was private? there will be no morals involved in his treatment.
The NHS has what is called a 'zero tolerance' policy towards abuse. I am an NHS manager and I can reassure you that this decision will not have been taken lightly - the gentleman in question will have received clear warnings and will have had the consequenses of continuing with the abuse explained to him. He chose to ignore it. He will have had a right of appeal, and can make a complaint to the independent Healthcare Commission, who would look at the case to ensure he has been treated fairly.
The policy is intended to protect NHS staff from abuse and violence. Any commercial business would do the same. If a customer came into Marks and Spencers and abused staff or sent in abusive or offensive messages or images they would be banned, and rightlyso.