ChatterBank7 mins ago
Looks like he is going ahead no matter what!
In the Mirror today
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_headline=blair %2D-we-can%2Dt-go-on-without-toll-tax%26method =full%26objectid=18586574%26siteid=94762-name_ page.html
How arrogant is this man?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_headline=blair %2D-we-can%2Dt-go-on-without-toll-tax%26method =full%26objectid=18586574%26siteid=94762-name_ page.html
How arrogant is this man?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Kathyan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm wondering how the foreign truck drivers will be billed?
Pay as you enter?
The M20 is shocking, and we get operation stack here too because of traffic.
It (the government) says there will be no more road tax. and by the looks of things some will be paying 10x more... and it will be spent on improving public transport?
So, Railtrack? private. SE Trains. Private. Does the government fund them? because I thought our monthly bill of �400 to commute paid towards upkeep. And those trains are packed at rush hour!!!
I think this country is in a massive deficit, war chest and all?
Does the tax we pay go towards that too?
How do you get hold of the real figures?
Pay as you enter?
The M20 is shocking, and we get operation stack here too because of traffic.
It (the government) says there will be no more road tax. and by the looks of things some will be paying 10x more... and it will be spent on improving public transport?
So, Railtrack? private. SE Trains. Private. Does the government fund them? because I thought our monthly bill of �400 to commute paid towards upkeep. And those trains are packed at rush hour!!!
I think this country is in a massive deficit, war chest and all?
Does the tax we pay go towards that too?
How do you get hold of the real figures?
Devil's Advocate Time Again:
If you use a resource more than the next person, shouldn't you pay more for it?
Why should someone who only uses the roads once a fortnight to get the shopping in pay as much as the commuter who drives 15,000 per year?
Sure, some people will pay considerably more, but if road tax is indeed abolished, there are some people who will pay substantially less.
(By the way, I see horrible implications in terms of inflation - road haulage companies will have to pass on increased costs to the consumer which will lead to inflation - putting it simplistically...that's how I see it working).
If you use a resource more than the next person, shouldn't you pay more for it?
Why should someone who only uses the roads once a fortnight to get the shopping in pay as much as the commuter who drives 15,000 per year?
Sure, some people will pay considerably more, but if road tax is indeed abolished, there are some people who will pay substantially less.
(By the way, I see horrible implications in terms of inflation - road haulage companies will have to pass on increased costs to the consumer which will lead to inflation - putting it simplistically...that's how I see it working).
What about the disabled who don't pay road tax then? They will not feel the benefit of abolishing the road tax, but they will also have to pay to use the roads. The argument that 'I don't drive, why should I fund people who do' is silly. We all use the roads whether driving, cycling or using public transport.
We already have a method by which people who use the road alot pay more than those who use it less.
It's called petrol duty.
People who don't use the road at all pay nothing, and what's more, people who drive 'greener' cars pay less.
There's no need for this. It's just a way of getting more money out of us, whilst handing a lucrative IT contract to some 'Lord' Crony of Cronyshire or other.
It's called petrol duty.
People who don't use the road at all pay nothing, and what's more, people who drive 'greener' cars pay less.
There's no need for this. It's just a way of getting more money out of us, whilst handing a lucrative IT contract to some 'Lord' Crony of Cronyshire or other.
Wickerman, Your cornflakes are delivered to Tesco by the Tally Ho bunch, using an old cob and a cart!!!!!!!
We dont do any other work of course, or contribute in any way to society, and we are all filthy rich, so we could afford any tax the lovely Mr Blair throws at us!!!!!!
Nice view from your high rise though.
We dont do any other work of course, or contribute in any way to society, and we are all filthy rich, so we could afford any tax the lovely Mr Blair throws at us!!!!!!
Nice view from your high rise though.
It's a brilliant plan isn't it? - there are too many cars on the road so we'll make it so non-rich people can't afford to drive.
Why not apply the same technique to solving hospital wating lists and overcrowded classrooms? �500 quid to see the doctor and �50 for each lesson your kid wants to attend. That should do the trick.
Why not apply the same technique to solving hospital wating lists and overcrowded classrooms? �500 quid to see the doctor and �50 for each lesson your kid wants to attend. That should do the trick.
horsetache 1 - I wouldn't know about the highrise, I live in my detached house in a (very) rural area, hence my insight into the trouble of taxing people onto non-existent public transport.
Of course, if you'd read my posts properly, you'd see I was making the point that ordinary working people in rural areas will also be hit hard with such a tax, as they will have no alternative but to use their cars.
Of course, if you'd read my posts properly, you'd see I was making the point that ordinary working people in rural areas will also be hit hard with such a tax, as they will have no alternative but to use their cars.
Whickerman makes a really good point...I live in London and have multiple choices when it comes to public transport.
However, there are huge swathes of the country where that is just not an option.
Unless there is a massive investment in the transport infrastructure in this places, this idea will fail.
...and there will be a lot of annoyed people (I'm thinking of those rural areas such as Norfolk, Hertfordshire and that place where the wheat comes from...can't remember it's name).
However, there are huge swathes of the country where that is just not an option.
Unless there is a massive investment in the transport infrastructure in this places, this idea will fail.
...and there will be a lot of annoyed people (I'm thinking of those rural areas such as Norfolk, Hertfordshire and that place where the wheat comes from...can't remember it's name).