Latest AB vote - leaving your child unattended

Avatar | 13:09 Mon 21st May 2007 | News

1 Answers

A pointless exercise this latest vote I think as it does not give any age ranges. I think all 4 could quite correctly apply depending on the age of the child in question. I would certainly be happy to leave my 16 year old for half an hour playing on his PS3 whilst I wander next door. Am I evil incarnate?

British families should be first in the housing queue not immigrants

What is it with the Middle East?

Answers

Only 1 answer

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Avatar. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Hammer Head

I think from a legal point of view, a child in this case is classed as under 14 years old. So you are quite correct that the question is badly worded. I would not have left my 1 year old for any thing longer than a few minutes and only then if necessary. However, do you need to similary watch over 12 and 13 year olds?

Only 1 answer

Do you know the answer?