Excuse my retrospect, but I am 100 percent confident that such an issue was paramount some 20+ years ago when I was a school pupil.
Oh whoopee do, new research!! So what? Surely any parent who can read (which excludes a few no doubt) must have realised that evidence has always led the public to accept that E numbers cause hyper-active activity and strange pre-pubetic mis-behaviour.
Remember Kia-ora and Umbonga scares circa 1983 ish?
Actually they don't say that E numbers cause hyperactivity in kids.
They say some addititives are associated with hyperactivity in some kids.
It's important because it's proper evidence with additives that are currently in use and not homespun wisdom from parents.
For example in one test children were taken to 2 "parties" in one they were fed lots of sugar but given calming games and in the other party the reverse happened.
But they told the parents they were the other way around!
The parents thought the children were more hyperactive after the party when they thought the children had had the sugar but they'd been actually been having fruit and sandwiches!
Not quite sure. But I am sure it says on some of them in bold black "SMOKING KILLS".
Yes it does, but even a staunch anti smoker like me realises that not all smokers will die from smokers.
I am just pointed out that the use of my language has not negated the fact I have seen seen the news and thus realise that an entire populus will not be directly effective by the consumption of e numbers. And if there are double negatives in that last statement, hey ho!!
I just don't really see the point of the research. I, for instance, can see that when my son has any kind of sugar free squash his behaviour deteriorates, so answer is - don't let him have it. I don't need millions spent on research to show me that. I am more interested in things causing damage that you will not be aware of .i.e. research into the causes of disease.
Thanks, Shadow Man, for the explanation. Does that mean that on your cans, packages, bottles etc. the name of the ingredients and additives are not written: you have to go by numbers? That must be confusing.
I've been obsessing over this as my son is very hyper, but some artificial sweetners go by their scientific name and not the E number, Fruit shoots have two E numbers on them (aspartame and acesulfame) - really nasty stuff!