Yes, free speech is sacred. The debate will allow others to disagree with them. Every person has a right to express their views without violence. Just because we may not agree with their views they have a right to say it otherwise we could be in the situation where that school teacher cannot even put a name to a teddy without being locked up.
Hi naomi,
I agree, in the interests of free speech, there's nothing to stop them being invited to speak, however,
given the history of David Irving, and Nick Griffin (BNP), i'd be just a little worried that they've been invited together, and would question the reason.
There was no obligation to ask Irving and Griffin to speak at an event merely because they happen to know something about free speech. Irving and Griffen weren't clamouring at the door to speak, they were invited. Free speech does not mean any group is *obliged* to invite *anyone*.
Equally however, having invited these two gentlemen, they must be allowed to speak, otherwise freedom of speech means nothing.
I mean that seriously. Griffin and the rest of the white supremacist mime-readers will be challenged by the brightest minds in the country.
They never have a real chance to have their views challenged in a civilized debate, and this would give them an opportunity to be 'hoisted by their own petards'.
Next, they should invite some radical Muslim clerics and give them the same treatment.
Absolutely! I hope someone films it, and we all get to see it. It may not be pleasant to most people to hear what they have to say, but it would be interesting to hear the debate. I do not know much at all about Irving. But I have heard a lot of the statements that Griffin has made. I have never seen him in a debate though, were people can question or refute his statements on the spot. if we want to keep the the privelige of freedom of speech in this country then we must allow everyone the right to say whatever they like no matter how unpleasant it is. But the PC brigade are in the process of destroying this right.
Yes and why not? They're obviously not afraid of challenging those so called "brightest minds in the Country" as sp put it. Maybe, however, it's those Oxford experts that might just come off second best in the debate.
The only way you can challenge someone's views is allow them to make them, and for intelligent people to argue against them.
I've never seen BNP leaders interviewed extensively on television because TV execs are terrified of a public backlash (cf. Shilpa Sheppy).
It would be brilliant if a debate could be set up between the Jewish anti defamation league, the Anti Nazi League and the BNP.
Remember how ridiculous the Tories made themselves look when they banned the Sinn Fein?
I say let the BNP voice their policies. Let them be scrutinized. I'd wager that the majority of people with even the most basic analytical skills will see exactly what the BNP are. It would be the biggest PR own goal since Gerald Ratner made that comment.
SP, absolutely right. I'm all for freedom of speech whatever that may involve. Legislation may prevent people from speaking, but it doesn't stop them thinking.