Technology2 mins ago
Why I despise this bloody Labour Govt.
16 Answers
1) The way they favour the criminal
2) The way they treat OUR Ghurkas
3) The way they punish, through taxes, middle England
4) Their view on Islam being normal.
Just a general rant.
Please add any comments that effect you or why, like any decent human being, should despise Labour and the foul pug faced, one-eyed complete puss-bag Brown.
Thank you.
2) The way they treat OUR Ghurkas
3) The way they punish, through taxes, middle England
4) Their view on Islam being normal.
Just a general rant.
Please add any comments that effect you or why, like any decent human being, should despise Labour and the foul pug faced, one-eyed complete puss-bag Brown.
Thank you.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Abdulmajid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Plus
The 'average' family paying �5,500 more in tax PA under this government.
Not adjusting the higher rate threshold by nearly enough resulting in more and more people being caught by fiscal drag - a stealth tax by any other name.
Removing the cap on NI.
Pension theft.
Too much public spending.
Sleaze (have far out-sleazed the Tories).
The do as I say not as I do philosophy (see Blair, Harmon, Abbott, Kelly).
The willingness to pay for the idle to stay on benefits popping out kids willy nilly - thus encoraging the chav scum underclass (see Dewsbury).
Multiculturalism (doesn't work with a certain sector of our inhabitants, we all know who they are - we should be striving for integration).
The fact they inherited a strong economy and have reverted to type (tax and spend) and have not made provision for what appear to be lean times ahead.
The list is endless................
The 'average' family paying �5,500 more in tax PA under this government.
Not adjusting the higher rate threshold by nearly enough resulting in more and more people being caught by fiscal drag - a stealth tax by any other name.
Removing the cap on NI.
Pension theft.
Too much public spending.
Sleaze (have far out-sleazed the Tories).
The do as I say not as I do philosophy (see Blair, Harmon, Abbott, Kelly).
The willingness to pay for the idle to stay on benefits popping out kids willy nilly - thus encoraging the chav scum underclass (see Dewsbury).
Multiculturalism (doesn't work with a certain sector of our inhabitants, we all know who they are - we should be striving for integration).
The fact they inherited a strong economy and have reverted to type (tax and spend) and have not made provision for what appear to be lean times ahead.
The list is endless................
I used to be a staunch Labour supporter, but would never vote for them again. I detest this nanny society we live in, where criminals appear to have more rights than their victims. I detest taxation on every little thing and the way people who want to do well in life are penalised through exorbitant taxes, so those who want to leach off the state can do so freely.
This country has really gone to the dogs, I'm not sure if there is any way back as we don't seem to have any strong or competent alternatives.
As for Islam, as a religion, I wouldn't say it was abnormal as such, but would agree our Labour government tolerate Moslems with extremist views. We all know as Christians, if we went to many Islamic countries and started preaching christianity, let alone voice any fundamental views, we would be subjected to a public stoning or have our heads chopped off.
This country has really gone to the dogs, I'm not sure if there is any way back as we don't seem to have any strong or competent alternatives.
As for Islam, as a religion, I wouldn't say it was abnormal as such, but would agree our Labour government tolerate Moslems with extremist views. We all know as Christians, if we went to many Islamic countries and started preaching christianity, let alone voice any fundamental views, we would be subjected to a public stoning or have our heads chopped off.
Disagree on the Gurkhas. Until Hong Kong shut up shop they were recruited out there, based out there. OK so they served anywhere around the world when demanded. They knew the basis of the contract they had.
Now they are based over here, so every Gurkha recruited under the new contract has a different entitlement.
So why the hell should the Government retrospectively change the rules for those that retired earlier? Press fantasy as usual - largely led by the BBC - yet another non-story.
Now they are based over here, so every Gurkha recruited under the new contract has a different entitlement.
So why the hell should the Government retrospectively change the rules for those that retired earlier? Press fantasy as usual - largely led by the BBC - yet another non-story.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.