Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Clocks being put back
Shortly we are due to put our clocks back with darker evenings causing more accidents and some children having to find their way home from school in the dark. The cost to the country must also be enormous. What are the savings in % terms to keep the clocks on Summer time? A decent guess would be OK/
Answers
1 to 20 of 20
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rov1200. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
My recollection is that the change is for the benefit of school children in Scotland. Without the change those children would be travelling to school on dark mornings which increases their risk of being injured in traffic accidents.
Presumably it has been concluded that this saving out weighs the cost. But I don't know if there is any % worked out:-
like X no of Scottish school children am, versus Y no of British children pm?
Presumably it has been concluded that this saving out weighs the cost. But I don't know if there is any % worked out:-
like X no of Scottish school children am, versus Y no of British children pm?
I live up near the Scottish Border. It's soooo depressing getting up when it's still dark - when the clocks go back it is correspondingly lighter in the mornings....
I went to school way down south in the Channel Islands, and seem to recall a year or maybe two when daylight saving was abandoned (mid to late sixties?) Does anyone else remember this? I was way too young to make a judgement, but think it caused a lot of bother at the time.
I went to school way down south in the Channel Islands, and seem to recall a year or maybe two when daylight saving was abandoned (mid to late sixties?) Does anyone else remember this? I was way too young to make a judgement, but think it caused a lot of bother at the time.
I thing Terrembulam the point is Council tax hasn't kept pace with the rise in energy prices which is why they're looking to make savings like cuttuing street lighting in the early hours.
As you say another topic.
I know rov - tell the Scots
Every time the subject of keeping BST permanently comes up they complain about children going to school in the dark and a study about fatalities in road accidents (which looks increasingly dodgy).
I don't see why they can't adopt a different time zone - The US manages very well with split time zones and England could keep a contant time zone or adopt the European time zone.
As you say another topic.
I know rov - tell the Scots
Every time the subject of keeping BST permanently comes up they complain about children going to school in the dark and a study about fatalities in road accidents (which looks increasingly dodgy).
I don't see why they can't adopt a different time zone - The US manages very well with split time zones and England could keep a contant time zone or adopt the European time zone.
I just wish we would be in line with Europe. The one thing that would be usefull and they wont do it. If you have to work with anyone in Bruxelles then you would find it a nightmare, they are in an hour earlier, take two hours out for lunch and go home earlier and the day is gone. None of this makes sense.
I also dont see where the figures for children dying getting off the school bus comes from anyway. It can only be a guess.
I also dont see where the figures for children dying getting off the school bus comes from anyway. It can only be a guess.
The Scottish newspaper, The Daily Record, goes through the roof every time the concept of moving to "double summer time" is mooted.
They then tell everyone that the Shetland Islanders will not see sunrise till 10am and bleat about how awful that would be for them, convieniently forgetting that Shetland enjoys practically 24 hour daylight during late June and early jul;y as compensation for short winter days.
A move to BST and double BST should be done now to help tourism.
They then tell everyone that the Shetland Islanders will not see sunrise till 10am and bleat about how awful that would be for them, convieniently forgetting that Shetland enjoys practically 24 hour daylight during late June and early jul;y as compensation for short winter days.
A move to BST and double BST should be done now to help tourism.
Some points:
1. If Scotland want their own governance then why should we care how they arrange their daylight affairs.
2. Talk in the press about a severe recession would surely put us a par with war time Britain and the necessary time adjustments to be made,
3. 2013 is a long way away.
4. A calculation was made some time ago about how much we would save but the powers that be shelved it. Maybe we should dust out the findings.
1. If Scotland want their own governance then why should we care how they arrange their daylight affairs.
2. Talk in the press about a severe recession would surely put us a par with war time Britain and the necessary time adjustments to be made,
3. 2013 is a long way away.
4. A calculation was made some time ago about how much we would save but the powers that be shelved it. Maybe we should dust out the findings.
I had not heard the proposal mentioned by Gromit concerning European Standard Time. Another example of proposed (or more likely already agreed) legislation by the EU about which little is heard and no debate has taken place.
The EU covers about 40 degrees of longitude from the Black Sea coast of Romania to the west coast of Ireland. This represents a difference in sunrise/sunset times of about two and a half hours. By contrast the mainland of the USA covers about 55 degrees but they see fit to divide their country into four time zones (roughly fifteen degrees each, covering one hour of sunrise/sunset time).
Just what is it about the EU that it sees the necessity to standardise time across such a distance? It gets dark in Romania two and a half hours before it does so in Kerry, yet under this proposal clocks in both locations will show the same time.
People in the UK manage to do business with those in the US, although the time difference may be between five and nine hours. Those in the east of the US manage to talk to those on the western seaboard even though they are four hours adrift. Yet people in Europe cannot cope with time differences of one or two hours.
I imagine we will still change our clocks in Spring and Autumn (thus making the UK one hour ahead of GMT in the winter, two in the summer). This means it will stay light until 11pm in June and dark until 9am in December. Is that really what everybody wants?
The EU covers about 40 degrees of longitude from the Black Sea coast of Romania to the west coast of Ireland. This represents a difference in sunrise/sunset times of about two and a half hours. By contrast the mainland of the USA covers about 55 degrees but they see fit to divide their country into four time zones (roughly fifteen degrees each, covering one hour of sunrise/sunset time).
Just what is it about the EU that it sees the necessity to standardise time across such a distance? It gets dark in Romania two and a half hours before it does so in Kerry, yet under this proposal clocks in both locations will show the same time.
People in the UK manage to do business with those in the US, although the time difference may be between five and nine hours. Those in the east of the US manage to talk to those on the western seaboard even though they are four hours adrift. Yet people in Europe cannot cope with time differences of one or two hours.
I imagine we will still change our clocks in Spring and Autumn (thus making the UK one hour ahead of GMT in the winter, two in the summer). This means it will stay light until 11pm in June and dark until 9am in December. Is that really what everybody wants?
1 to 20 of 20
Latest Posts
Sport3 mins ago
Starmer's Approval Rating Plummets,
News3 mins ago
ChatterBank4 mins ago
Crosswords7 mins ago
