"Nathaniel Rothschild, a financier, who arranged the meeting, has alleged that Mr Osborne and Mr Feldman sought to solicit a donation to the Conservatives from the Russian businessman.
In a letter made public this morning he alleged that the possibility of a �50,000 gift to the Tories was discussed
Mr Deripaska, one of the world's richest men, is a foreign national who is therefore not permitted to donate money to British political parties and he is alleged to have been advised to give the money via a British firm he owns.
Such an arrangement may fall foul of electoral laws and would lead to accusations that the Conservatives had behaved unethically."
Indeed "may fall foul" highlights how grey and murky are the rules for political donations (just as others of the self-imposed, self-regulated rules "governing" politicians and their parties prove to be).
However, to compare and contrast allegations, is this "perhaps" infraction really on the same par as that of European Trade Commissioner Mandelson signing off rule changes that benefited Derispaka's businesses months after dining together in Moscow (again in the company of Rothschild)?
that's true, Berti, I was writing with my tongue ever so slightly in my cheek. His denial was pretty explicit; but of course sometimes these meetings just put out feelers without ever mentioning the word 'cash'
George osbourne should have kept his mouth shut about mandelsons private conversation with him.Not to be trusted..is mr osbourne..!well he is a tory.and nat rothschild is pi$$ed of with him,.and has given mr mandleson a perfect birthday present.This does not look good for the Tories.!
in that photo, I'm impressed by the looks of "Mark Petre, son of 18th Century Baron Petre", as the story describes him. He must be 200 if he's a day. I suppose it's the cocaine that keeps the wrinkles at bay.
jno, given that the photo also shows 'Peter Holmes a Court' and 'Lupus von Matzahn', I wouldn't be surprised if '18th Century Baron Petre' was just his dad's name.