Drivel:
The reason the "death by abdominal haemorrage" was missed during the first post mortem examination can only be answered in the fullness of time.
The reason I say that is because different pathologists carried out the two examinations and, for whatever reasons, still to be explained, have reached different conclusions as to the cause of death.
Steve: No offence. Isn't that where "Lily Savage" comes from?
Both verdicts, it's crucial to note, are what is known as "provisional", which, to use a horse racing analogy is like declaring the winner before the jockeys have weighed in. There is still a long way to go before a final conclusion is reached.
Don't forget, at the moment all we have are media reports, and that's all they are - reports. It won't be until the IPCC have gathered all available evidence and information that the $64,000 question(s) will be answered:
1) What was the reason for Mr Tomlinson's death?
2) What or who caused it?
For what it's worth, the mobile phone footage of the incident certainly shows that the Police Officer involved appears to use excessive force trying to move Mr Tomlinson on. Still doesn't prove that his action caused the unfortunate man's death.