MPs, I thought, were accountable? If yes, then they cannot simply blame "the system" for their own personal greed and avarice. How can tampons, bathplugs, kit kats, pet food, porno dvds etc be classified as "necessarily incurred" expenses?
The wider picture including the scandal of the homes' "flipping" fiasco can in no way be blamed on "the system". Are these people actually asking us to believe that their "innocent naivety" allowed them to accumulate many thousands of pounds at taxpayers' expense, sometimes several times over, simply because "the system" condoned it? To use a cliche well worn in political circles, it beggars belief!
There are some 646 MPs and who knows how many of those have consistently abused "the system" by literally biting off the hand that feeds them, i.e. the good old British taxpayers.
The only reason why we're now getting "heartfelt apologies" from them is not borne from contrition or conscience, but merely because they've been caught red handed with their sticky, grasping little digits in the till, banged to rights!
I have little doubt that instead of mass resignations of MPs, we will indeed have a witchhunt instigated by the very perpetrators themselves to find some suitable scapegoats, i.e. faceless civil servants from the claims department sanctioning their wrongdoings.
The system may indeed be flawed but no one forced any of the "honourable members" to exploit it so ruthlessly and callously in order to extract every last penny they could from the unsuspecting taxpayer.
The system obviously needs a drastic overhaul but isn't that also what Westminster needs too?