ChatterBank1 min ago
Ganhi statue
21 Answers
http://www.hindu.com/2009/06/27/stories/200906 2754611100.htm
Should a statue of the anti-British agitator Gandhi, be erected in the English city of Leicester?
Leicester, which is home to some 280,000 people of Indian origin, is likely to become the first British city where the native white population will be reduced to a minority by 2015.
Perhaps we will then need our own 'Gandhi' to fight for our freedom?
Should a statue of the anti-British agitator Gandhi, be erected in the English city of Leicester?
Leicester, which is home to some 280,000 people of Indian origin, is likely to become the first British city where the native white population will be reduced to a minority by 2015.
Perhaps we will then need our own 'Gandhi' to fight for our freedom?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It could have been worse, it was a toss up between him and jug ears Lineker.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news /gandhi-or-gary-why-leicester-cant-decide-who- should-sit-on-plinth-790874.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news /gandhi-or-gary-why-leicester-cant-decide-who- should-sit-on-plinth-790874.html
I don't really believe the achievements of Gandhi can be summed up with the phrase, anti British agitator.
He achieved his ambition by promoting non violent protest and deserves to be praised for that. He was also loved by the working class people of Britain on his visit in the 1940's.
It seems highly appropriate that he is honoured with a statue in Leicester. I'm actually surprised there are not more statues to this peaceful, decent man.
He achieved his ambition by promoting non violent protest and deserves to be praised for that. He was also loved by the working class people of Britain on his visit in the 1940's.
It seems highly appropriate that he is honoured with a statue in Leicester. I'm actually surprised there are not more statues to this peaceful, decent man.
He helped the British in the Great War by organising his supporters as stretcher bearers (if memory serves).
I don't see how this impinges on your freedom, nor do I feel that Ghandhi's example is a threat to our freedoms.
Ghandhi was an integrationilst, he despised partition in society (all society), and for all your ramblings (often bizarre) it's not the Indians (prdominately Hindu) or the Sikhs who cause the troubles or threaten the freedoms you so frequently refer too.
I don't see how this impinges on your freedom, nor do I feel that Ghandhi's example is a threat to our freedoms.
Ghandhi was an integrationilst, he despised partition in society (all society), and for all your ramblings (often bizarre) it's not the Indians (prdominately Hindu) or the Sikhs who cause the troubles or threaten the freedoms you so frequently refer too.
-- answer removed --
Many ex-terrorists are now welcomed in the UK.
Nelson Mandella advocated bombs in South Africa but is now a hero wherever he goes, and we have schools and roads named after him.
We now have Irish MPs who until a few years ago were terrorists.
Yesterdays "terrorists" are todays "freedom fighters".
(Not suggesting Gandhi was a terrorist, far from it, just showing how attitudes towards people can change).
Try watching Gandhi by Richard Attenborough to see how we treated some of the people in India.
Nelson Mandella advocated bombs in South Africa but is now a hero wherever he goes, and we have schools and roads named after him.
We now have Irish MPs who until a few years ago were terrorists.
Yesterdays "terrorists" are todays "freedom fighters".
(Not suggesting Gandhi was a terrorist, far from it, just showing how attitudes towards people can change).
Try watching Gandhi by Richard Attenborough to see how we treated some of the people in India.
VHG in fairness to Ghandhi he was highly critical of Idian attitudes towards their own people, that's why he adopted a Dalit girl, it was also his desire to reform India into a just country with equality that led ultimately to his assination.
He wanted too much too soon, the traditional ruling castes were'nt going to give up their influence lightly.
He wanted too much too soon, the traditional ruling castes were'nt going to give up their influence lightly.
The man was a pacifist who was an "agitator" because his country was occupied by foreigners - us! Try putting the flip flop on the other foot, aog, you'd be hailing him as a hero for speaking out against anti British oppression.
There are many statues in this country to which people could justifiably object, but this is certainly not among them.
There are many statues in this country to which people could justifiably object, but this is certainly not among them.
>The first British city where the native white population
>will be reduced to a minority by 2015.
Whether you agree with it or not this is through our governments choice, we agreed to let the people come here.
Our occupation of India was not through the choice of the Indians (even though we did a lot of good things there).
>will be reduced to a minority by 2015.
Whether you agree with it or not this is through our governments choice, we agreed to let the people come here.
Our occupation of India was not through the choice of the Indians (even though we did a lot of good things there).
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.